The provision of information on time-lapse imaging: A systematic analysis of UK fertility clinics websites
Perrotta, M.; Zampino, L.; Geampana, A.; Bhide, P.
Show abstract
Structured AbstractO_ST_ABSResearch QuestionC_ST_ABSThis study aims to systematically analyse the provision of information on Time-lapse Imaging (TLI) by UK fertility clinic websites. DesignWe conducted an analysis of 106 clinic websites that offer fertility treatment to self-funded patients. The analysis aimed to examine whether these clinics offer TLI, the associated cost for patients, and the clarity and quality of the provided information. ResultsOut of the 106 websites analysed, 71 (67%) claimed to offer TLI, with 17 being NHS clinics and 54 being private clinics. Among these websites, 25 (35.2%) mentioned charging patients between {pound}300 and {pound}850, 25 (35.8%) claimed not to charge patients, and 21 (29.6%) did not provide any cost information for TLI. Although TLI is generally considered safe for patients and embryos, only 21 (29.6%) websites provided information on the associated risks. Furthermore, 64 (90.1%) websites made claims or implied that TLI leads to improved clinical outcomes by enhancing embryo selection. Notably, 34 (47.9%) websites did not mention or provide any links to the HFEA traffic light system. Additionally, 30 (42.2%) websites made claims regarding the effectiveness of TLI that contradicted the assessment of the HFEA, referring to early, mostly unspecified, studies. ConclusionsIt is crucial to provide patients with clear and accurate information to enable them to make fully informed decisions about TLI, particularly when they are responsible for the associated costs. The findings of this study raise concerns about the reliability and accuracy of the information available on fertility clinic websites, which are typically the primary source of information for patients.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying Women at Risk for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Using a Mobile Health Application 93%
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 89%
- Using Twitter Data for Cohort Studies of Drug Safety in Pregnancy: A Proof-of-Concept with Beta-Blockers 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 95%
- Men and sexual and reproductive healthcare in the Nordic countries: a scoping review 92%
- Understanding preferences for self-sampling in a national cervical screening programme: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort profile: The Bristol IVF Study- A longitudinal study of women, their partners and treatment outcomes following assisted reproductive technologies 93%
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 92%
- Cost savings in male circumcision post-operative care continuum in rural and urban South Africa: Evidence on the importance of initial counselling and daily SMS 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use and impact of surveillance-based technology initiatives in inpatient and acute mental health settings: A systematic review 88%
- Evidence for treatment with estradiol for women with SARS-CoV-2 infection 87%
- Deep Immunophenotyping Reveals Endometriosis is Marked by Dysregulation of the Mononuclear Phagocytic System in Endometrium and Peripheral Blood 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early medical abortion using telemedicine – acceptability to patients 96%
- The Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale: clinical considerations and comparison with other questions about pregnancy preferences 94%
- Should COVID-specific arrangements for abortion continue? The views of women experiencing abortion in Britain during the pandemic 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.