Crowdsourcing strategies to improve access to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Australia, the Philippines, and China
Tieosapjaroen, W.; Ongkeko, A. M.; Yin, Z.; Termavanich, K.; Tucker, J. D.; Tang, W.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; Castillo-Carandang, N. T.; Ong, J. J.
Show abstract
IntroductionMany Asian countries have yet to scale up HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Innovative strategies to increase PrEP uptake are needed. This study examined the use of crowdsourcing to increase PrEP uptake by describing and analysing the experiences of Australia, the Philippines, and China. MethodsThree crowdsourcing open calls were conducted between 2021-2022 in Australia, the Philippines and China. Crowdsourcing has a group of individuals solve all or part of a problem, then share back solutions with the public. All open calls entailed: 1) problem identification; 2) committee formation with local groups; 3) community engagement for idea submission; 4) evaluation of submissions; 5) awarding incentives to finalists; and 6) solution dissemination via web and social media. We examined the number of total and high-quality submissions. We also identified themes across countries. ResultsThe Australia, Philippines, and China teams received 9, 22 and 19 eligible submissions, respectively. A total of three, 10, and eight submissions had a mean score of 6/10 or greater. Three common solutions emerged across all the finalist ideas: enhancing service delivery; optimizing promotional campaigns; person-centered promotional materials. The winning ideas from the Australian, Filipino and Chinese teams were an anonymous online PrEP service, a printed ready-to-wear garment to create awareness about PrEP, and a poster on PrEP effectiveness, respectively. ConclusionsCrowdsourcing can be a promising and versatile tool for developing PrEP strategies in Asia. Further evaluations via clinical trials can bridge the gap between idea generation and implementation, thus, creating the empirical evidence pivotal for the policy adoption of these innovations.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A community-engaged mHealth intervention to increase uptake of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in China: Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial 95%
- Positive deviance for promoting dual-method contraceptive use among women in Uganda: a cluster randomized controlled trial 93%
- Protocol for a qualitative study exploring the experiences and perceptions of dolutegravir/lamivudine dual antiretroviral therapy (the PEDAL Study) in people living with HIV 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of a multimedia campaign on HIV self-testing and PrEP outcomes among young people in South Africa: A mixed-methods impact evaluation of ‘MTV Shuga Down South’ 93%
- Public engagement and crowdfunding for health research: A global qualitative evidence synthesis and TDR pilot 92%
- Designathons in Health Research: A Global Systematic Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using a crowdsourcing open call, hackathon and a modified Delphi method to develop a consensus statement and sexual health survey instrument 94%
- Should we screen less frequently for chlamydia and gonorrhoea in gay and bisexual men who have sex with men? Findings from a global crowdsourcing exercise with experts 93%
- Recommendations for developing asynchronous online consultations for chlamydia treatment for underserved populations: A Behaviour Change Wheel analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of a male-targeted digital decision support application aimed at increasing linkage to HIV care among men: Findings from the HITS cluster randomized clinical trial in rural South Africa 94%
- Undetectable=untransmittable (U=U) messaging increases uptake of HIV testing among men: Results from a pilot cluster randomized trial 92%
- Maternal PrEP use in HIV-uninfected pregnant women in South Africa: Role of Stigma in PrEP initiation, retention and adherence 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.