Back

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Efficient Low Back Pain Prediction Using Demographic and Lifestyle Factors

Kim, J.-h.

2023-10-30 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2023.10.29.23297737
Show abstract

BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) is one of the most frequently occurring musculoskeletal disorders, and factors such as lifestyle as well as individual characteristics are associated with LBP. The purpose of this study was to develop and compare efficient low back pain prediction models using easily obtainable demographic and lifestyle factors. MethodsData from adult men and women aged 50 years or older collected from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) were used. The dataset included 22 predictor variables, including demographic, physical activity, occupational, and lifestyle factors. Four machine learning algorithms, including XGBoost, LGBM, CatBoost, and RandomForest, were used to develop predictive models. ResultsAll models achieved an accuracy greater than 0.8, with the LGBM model outperforming the others with an accuracy of 0.830. The CatBoost model had the highest sensitivity (0.804), while the LGBM model showed the highest specificity (0.884) and F1-Score (0.821). Feature importance analysis revealed that EQ-5D was the most critical variable across all models. ConclusionIn this study, an efficient LBP prediction model was developed using easily accessible variables. Using this model, it may be helpful to identify the risk of LBP in advance or establish prevention strategies in subjects who have difficulty accessing medical facilities.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 16%
21.6%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 6%
13.7%
3
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 0.4%
5.2%
4
Healthcare
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
JMIR Medical Informatics
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
3.1%
6
Journal of Occupational Health
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 8%
2.7%
8
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 5%
2.7%
9
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 32%
2.7%
10
The Journal of Pain
based on 11 papers
Top 0.6%
2.5%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 6%
2.5%
12
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
2.0%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 9%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Medical Informatics
based on 25 papers
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 4%
1.7%
16
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 10%
1.5%
17
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
based on 36 papers
Top 5%
1.5%
18
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 0.7%
1.4%
19
Gait & Posture
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 8%
0.9%
22
Brain and Behavior
based on 19 papers
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Sensors
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.9%
24
F1000Research
based on 28 papers
Top 5%
0.7%