Back

Echocardiographic characterisation in severe Covid-19 with respiratory failure - an observational study.

Isackson, H.; Larsson, A.; Lipcsey, M.; Frithiof, R.; Flachskampf, F.; Hultstrom, M.

2023-10-28 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.10.27.23297666 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveWe aimed to investigate cardiac effects of severe SARS-CoV-2 and the importance of echocardiography-assessment and biomarkers. MethodsThis is an observational study of the first patients admitted to intensive care due to SARS-CoV-2-respiratory failure. Thirty-four underwent echocardiography of which twenty-five were included, compared to forty-four non-echo patients. Exclusion was based on absence of normofrequent sinus rhythm and/or mechanical respiratory support. Biomarkers were analysed on clinical indication. ResultsMortality was higher in the echo-compared to non-echo group (44 % vs. 16%, p<0.05). Right-sided parameters were not under significant strain. Tricuspid valve regurgitation velocity indicated how increased pulmonary pressure was associated with mortality (survivors: 2.51 {+/-} 0.01 m/s vs. non-survivors: 3.06 {+/-} 0.11 m/s, p<0.05), before multiple comparison-correction. Setting cut-off for pulmonary hypertension to 2.8 m/s generated p<0.01 using frequency distribution testing. Cardiac markers, high sensitivity cardiac troponin I and N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, and D-dimer were higher in the echocardiography group. (hs-TnI (ng/L): echo : 133 {+/-} 45 vs. non-echo: 81.3 {+/-} 45, p<0.01; NT-proBNP (ng/L): echo: 2959 {+/-} 573 vs. non-echo: 1641 {+/-} 420, p<0.001; D-dimer (mg/L): echo: 16.1 {+/-} 3.7 vs. non-echo: 6.1 {+/-} 1.5, p<0.01) and non-survivor group (hs-TnI (ng/L): survivors: 59.1 {+/-} 21 vs. non-survivors: 211 {+/-} 105, p<0.0001; NT-proBNP (ng/L): survivors: 1310 {+/-} 314 vs. non-survivors: 4065 {+/-} 740, p<0.0001; D-dimer (mg/L): survivors: 7.2 {+/-} 1.5 vs. non-survivors: 17.1 {+/-} 4.8, p<0.01). Tricuspid regurgitation velocity was positively correlated with cardiac troponin I (r=0.93, r2=0.74, p<0.001). ConclusionsThese results suggest there is no negative effect on cardiac function in critical SARS-CoV-2. Pulmonary pressure appears higher amongst non-survivors indicating pulmonary disease as the driver of mortality. Echocardiography was more commonly performed in the non-survivor group, and cardiac biomarkers as well as D-dimer was higher in the non-survivor group suggesting they carry negative prognostic values. Trial registration numberThis is an observational study from patients included in "Clinical trials NCT04316884" Strength and limitations of this study- The patient cohort is recruited from consecutive patients admitted to the ICU in need of mechanical respiratory support independent of background which makes it relevant to clinical practice. - The echocardiographic image acquisition was carried out by hospital assigned agents on clinical indication, which makes the results applicable in a clinical setting. - Since the image acquisition was carried out on a clinical indication, the results may be skewed towards the false positive if applied to all Covid19 patients.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.