A mathematical model of the Alzheimer's Disease biomarker cascade demonstrates statistical pitfalls in identifying neurobiological surrogates of cognitive reserve
Fischer, F. U.; Gerber, S.; Tuescher, O.
Show abstract
IntroductionIn order to investigate neurobiological surrogates of cognitive reserve, statistical interaction analyses have been put forward and used by several studies. However, as these neurobiological surrogates are potentially affected by neurodegeneration as part of the amyloid cascade, which is characterized by chronological time-moderated associations between biomarkers, cross sectional sampling in combination with the disregard of time as a confounder could introduce interaction effects that may be misinterpretabed as cognitive reserve in statistical analyses. MethodsWe modeled the amyloid cascade with a minimal set of three biomarkers amyloid load, corticospinal fluid tau, hippocampal volume and cognitive outcome using a differential equation system, whose parameters were estimated from empirical data from the ADNI. Interaction effects between pathology markers amyloid and tau with hippocampal volume as potential marker of cognitive reserve were estimated on two simulated data samples. Both samples were calculated from varying amyloid, tau and hippocampal volume for the initial configuration of individual trajectories. For Sample 1, data points were sampled at a fixed time after baseline. For Sample 2, data points were sampled at random time points. ResultsRegression analyses on Sample 1 yielded estimates for interaction effects of 0. For Sample 2, estimates were -.1692 and -.0807 for amyloid and tau with hippocampal volume, respectively. The interaction effect estimates for Sample 2 decreased several orders of magnitude when taking into account the timepoint of sampling. ConclusionStudies aiming to investigate neurobiological surrogates of cognitive reserve that are affected by Alzheimers Disease-related neurodegenerative processes need to consider inter-individually varying sampling time points in the data to avoid misinterpreting interaction effects.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- c-Triadem: A constrained, explainable deep learning model to identify novel biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease 95%
- Associations between regional blood-brain barrier disruption, aging, and Alzheimers disease biomarkers in cognitively normal older adults 95%
- Interpretable multivariate survival models: Improving predictions for conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimers disease (AD) via data fusion and machine learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Topographical overlapping of the Aβ and Tau pathologies in the Default mode networks predicts Alzheimer’s Disease with higher specificity 95%
- Effect of Pathway-specific Polygenic Risk Scores for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) on Rate of Change in Cognitive Function and AD-related Biomarkers among Asymptomatic Individuals 95%
- Screening for early-stage Alzheimer's disease using optimized feature sets and machine learning 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting cognitive decline in a low-dimensional representation of brain morphology 93%
- Peripheral inflammation is associated with structural brain atrophy and cognitive decline linked to mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease 92%
- A FinnGen pilot clinical recall study for Alzheimer’s disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Network efficiency predicts resilience to cognitive decline in elderly at risk for Alzheimer's 95%
- Virtual brain simulations reveal network-specific parameters in neurodegenerative dementias 93%
- Phenotyping Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Profiles of Alzheimer's Disease Using Cluster Analysis on EEG Power 93%