Safety and Efficacy of Disulfiram in Hospitalized Patients with Moderate COVID-19: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Mota, A. C.; Filho, V. C. S.; Hendrickson, C. M.; DeVay, R. M.; Donne, M.; Nguyen, A. M.; Junqueira, C.; Marino, M.; Mehra, M.; Somaratne, R.; ELABD, C.; Kamens, B.; Cousin, W.
Show abstract
OBJECTIVESDisulfiram, a low-cost generic drug used for alcohol dependence, holds the potential to mitigate disease progression in patients with moderate COVID-19 by targeting inflammasomes. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of disulfiram when administered alongside standard of care for the treatment of hospitalized individuals with moderate COVID-19. DESIGNA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTINGConducted at four clinical sites in Brazil between December 2020 and August 2021. PARTICIPANTS140 participants aged 35 and older with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalized for [≤]5 days with moderate symptoms of COVID-19 were enrolled, 137 were randomized. INTERVENTIONParticipants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a daily dose of 500 mg of disulfiram (N=68) or placebo (N=69) for 14 days while receiving the current standard of care. Randomization was stratified by age and comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, and BMI [≥]35). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTSThe primary outcome, median time to clinical improvement [95% CI] did not significantly differ between groups (disulfiram: 3.5 [3.00, 4.00] days; placebo: 4 [3.00, 5.00] days; P=.73). Key secondary outcomes, such as mean days (SD) on supplemental oxygen [disulfiram: 4.4 (6.61) days; placebo: 3.7 (5.80) days, P=.34], median (95% CI) time to hospital discharge [disulfiram: 6.0 (5.00, 8.00) days, placebo: 5.0 (4.00, 7.00)], proportion of participants discharged by day 8 [disulfiram (68%), placebo (63%), odds ratio: 0.801], and proportion of participants who clinically worsened [disulfiram (21%), placebo (19%), P=.79], did not reveal significant differences. While the incidence of adverse events was higher in the disulfiram group, serious adverse events and 28-day mortality were comparable between the two groups. ConclusionsAlthough disulfiram was found to be safe in hospitalized patients with moderate COVID-19, it did not shorten the time to clinical improvement. These findings do not support the use of disulfiram alongside standard of care in this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04594343 Key PointsO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSDisulfiram has been proposed to mitigate disease progression in patients with COVID-19 by targeting the inflammasomes. QuestionDoes disulfiram, a generic drug used for alcohol use disorder, reduce the time to clinical improvement or reduce the risk of severe disease in hospitalized patients with moderate COVID-19 and with comorbidities when added to the standard of care? FindingsIn this double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of adults hospitalized with moderate COVID-19 in Brazil, the addition of an oral disulfiram treatment to the standard of care was safe. Still, it did not decrease the time to clinical improvement. MeaningThe study findings do not support the use of disulfiram in hospitalized patients with moderate COVID-19 in addition to the standard of care.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disulfiram associated with lower risk of Covid-19: a retrospective cohort study 95%
- Effects of risperidone on amino acid metabolism, glucose, and kidney function in healthy adults: A pilot randomized controlled trial 93%
- Hydroxychloroquine For The Treatment Of Severe Respiratory Infection By COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Alcohol Consumption is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Obese Patients with COVID-19: a Mendelian Randomization Study using UK Biobank 92%
- Efficacy and Safety of Habitual Consumption of a Food Supplement Containing Miraculin in Malnourished Cancer Patients: the CLINMIR Pilot Study 91%
- Oral bioavailability and metabolism of hydroxytyrosol from food supplements 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between Functional Inhibitors of Acid Sphingomyelinase and Reduced Risk of Intubation or Death in Individuals Hospitalized for Severe COVID-19: results from an observational multicenter study 93%
- Association between Psychotropic Medications Functionally Inhibiting Acid Sphingomyelinase and reduced risk of Intubation or Death among Individuals with Mental Disorder and Severe COVID-19: an Observational Study 93%
- Reliability of sucrose preference testing following short or no food and water deprivation - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of rat models of chronic unpredictable stress 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety of Hydroxychloroquine among Outpatient Clinical Trial Participants for COVID-19 93%
- Opaganib in COVID-19 pneumonia: Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2a trial 91%
- Sex and gender differences in COVID testing, hospital admission, presentation, and drivers of severe outcomes in the DC/Maryland region 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A preclinical model of THC edibles that produces high-dose cannabimimetic responses. 91%
- Blood metabolomic profiling reveals new targets in the management of psychological symptoms associated with severe alcohol use disorder 90%
- Systematic analysis of electronic health records identifies drugs reducing risk of COVID-19 hospitalization and severity 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.