Device-measured vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity and major cardiovascular events
Stamatakis, E.; Ahmadi, M. N.; Biswas, R. K.; del Pozo Cruz, B.; Thogersen-Ntoumani, C.; Murphy, M.; Sabag, A.; Lear, S.; Gill, J. M.; Chow, C. K.; Hamer, M.
Show abstract
ImportanceVigorous physical activity is a time-efficient and potent preventive intervention for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), although longer traditional exercise sessions are unappealing or inaccessible to most adults. ObjectiveWe examined the dose-response associations of device-measured vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity (VILPA, brief sporadic bouts of higher intensity occurring during daily living) with MACE and its sub-types in women and men. We also undertook analogous analyses in a sample of exercisers. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsProspective cohort analysis of 13,018 women and 9,350 men non-exercisers from the UK Biobank accelerometry sub-study; the contextual analyses involved 34,364 female/24,284 male exercisers from the same sub-study. ExposuresWrist accelerometer assessed daily VILPA duration of bouts lasting up to 1 and up to 2 minutes. Outcomes and MeasuresOverall and sex-specific dose-response associations of daily VILPA with MACE and its subtypes (incident myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke). ResultsAmong female/male non-exercisers there were 331/488 all-MACE events (129/250 myocardial infarction, 96/119 heart failure,106/119 stroke events) over a mean 7.9-year follow-up. Daily VILPA duration exhibited a near-linear dose-response association with all MACE, myocardial infarction, and heart failure in women but not in men. Compared to women with no VILPA, the median daily VILPA duration of 3.4 minutes per day was associated with HRs of 0.55 (0.41, 0.75) for all MACE; and 0.33 (0.18, 0.59) for heart failure. Womens minimum doses (the dose associated with 50% of the optimal risk reduction) of 1.2-1.6 minutes of VILPA per day were associated with HRs of 0.70 (0.58, 0.86) for all-MACE, 0.67 (0.50, 0.91) for myocardial infarction and 0.60 (0.45, 0.81) for heart failure, respectively. The equivalent analyses in exercisers in the UK Biobank showed comparable beneficial associations of vigorous intensity activity with all MACE, myocardial infarction and heart failure in both sex groups. Conclusions and RelevanceAmongst non-exercisers, small amounts of VILPA were associated with substantially lower risk of myocardial infarction and heart failure in women but not in men. No such sex differences were evident among exercisers. VILPA may be a promising physical activity target for CVD prevention in women not willing or able to exercise.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Joint association of genetic risk and accelerometer-based step count with cardiovascular disease: a UK-Biobank cohort study 94%
- Metabolomics data improve 10-year cardiovascular risk prediction with the SCORE2 algorithm for the general population without cardiovascular disease or diabetes 91%
- Effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention on the structural and functional substrate for atrial fibrillation in people with metabolic syndrome 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Is occupational physical activity associated with all-cause mortality in UK Biobank? 94%
- Vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity (VILPA) and mortality risk among US adults: a wearables-based national cohort study 92%
- Dose-response relationship between physical activity and mortality in adults with noncommunicable diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Age at menopause and the risk of stroke: Observational and Mendelian Randomization analysis in 204,244 postmenopausal women 93%
- Sleep duration irregularity and risk for incident cardiovascular disease in the UK Biobank 92%
- Estimating the Population Benefits of Blood Pressure Lowering: A Wide-Angled Mendelian Randomization Study in UK Biobank 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.