Back

Development and validation of risk prediction model for recurrent cardiovascular events among Chinese: P-CARDIAC model

Zhou, Y.; Lin, J.; Yu, Q.; Blaise, J. E.; Wan, E. Y. F.; Lee, M.; Wong, E.; Siu, D. C.-W.; Wong, V.; Chan, E. W. Y.; Lam, T.-W.; Chui, W.; Wong, I. C. K.; Luo, R.; Chui, C. S.

2023-10-17 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.10.17.23297127
Show abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate a cardiovascular diseases (CVD) risk prediction model, Personalized CARdiovascular DIsease risk Assessment for Chinese (P-CARDIAC), for recurrent cardiovascular events using Machine-Learning technique. Three cohorts of Chinese patients with established CVD in Hong Kong were included; Hong Kong Island cohort as the derivation cohort, whilst the Kowloon and New Territories cohorts were validation cohorts. The 10-year CVD outcome was a composite of diagnostic or procedure codes for coronary heart disease, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, peripheral artery disease, and revascularization. We estimated incidence of recurrent CVD events for each cohort with reference to the total person-years of each cohort. Multivariate imputation with chained equations (MICE) and XGBoost were applied for the model development. The comparison with TRS-2{degrees}P and SMART2 used the validation cohorts with 1000 bootstrap replicates. A total 48,799, 119,672 and 140,533 patients were included in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. A list of 125 risk variables were used to make predictions on CVD risk, of which, eight classes of medications were considered interactive drug use. Model performance in the derivation cohort showed satisfying discrimination and calibration with a C-statistic of 0{middle dot}69. Internal validation showed good discrimination and calibration performance with C-statistic over 0{middle dot}6. P-CARDIAC also showed better performance than TRS-2{degrees}P and SMART2. Compared to other risk scores, P-CARDIAC enables to identify unique patterns of Chinese patients with established CVD. We anticipate that P-CARDIAC can be applied in various settings to prevent recurrent CVD events, thus reducing the related healthcare burden. Condensed AbstractA CVD risk prediction model named Personalized CARdiovascular DIsease risk Assessment for Chinese (P-CARDIAC), for recurrent cardiovascular events among Chinese adults using Machine-Learning technique was newly developed. It predicted 10-year CVD outcome including a composite of diagnostic or procedure codes for coronary heart disease, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, peripheral artery disease, and revascularization by incidence of recurrent CVD. Model showed satisfying discrimination and calibration with a C-statistic of 0{middle dot}69. P-CARDIAC also showed better performance than existing risk scores, such as TRS-2{degrees}P and SMART2. P-CARDIAC could help predict recurrent CVD risk and reduce the healthcare burden.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 0.5%
13.0%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 21%
7.9%
3
Healthcare
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
5.5%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 5%
5.5%
5
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
based on 15 papers
Top 0.6%
4.9%
6
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 71%
4.7%
7
Biology Methods and Protocols
based on 19 papers
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
9
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
12
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 13%
2.3%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 8%
1.9%
14
European Heart Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 4%
1.6%
15
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
16
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 5%
1.4%
17
Heart
based on 10 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
18
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 44%
1.4%
19
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 12%
1.4%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 16%
1.4%
21
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
23
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
based on 37 papers
Top 4%
1.2%
24
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
based on 12 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
based on 12 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
26
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 21%
0.8%
27
Journal of Personalized Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Heart Rhythm
based on 16 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
29
International Journal of Cardiology
based on 13 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Medicine
based on 29 papers
Top 7%
0.8%