SODA: Software to Support the Curation and Sharing of FAIR Autonomic Nervous System Data
Marroquin, C.; Clark, J.; Portillo, D.; Soundarajan, S.; Patel, B.
Show abstract
Since 2014, the National Institutes of Health (NIH)s Stimulating Peripheral Activity to Relieve Conditions (SPARC) Program has been supporting research and development of therapeutic devices that modulate electrical activity in the autonomic nervous system (ANS) to improve organ function, also known as bioelectronic medicine. To optimize the reusability of data resulting from ANS-related research, the SPARC Program also supported the development of guidelines for curating and sharing data in line with the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) Principles. These guidelines are exhaustive to maximize FAIRness of data but as a result, they are difficult and time-consuming for researchers to implement. To address these challenges, we developed SODA (Software to Organize Data Automatically), an open source and free cross-platform desktop software that guides researchers step-by-step in preparing and sharing their ANS-related data according to the SPARC guidelines. SODA combines intuitive user interfaces with automation to streamline the process and reduce researchers time, effort, and error in making their data FAIR. We provide in this paper an overview of SODA and results of testing its performance. We also provide an overview of the impact of SODA which is, to our knowledge, the first researcher-oriented tool for making data FAIR.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The network makeup artist (NORMA-2.0): Distinguishing annotated groups in a network using innovative layout strategies 94%
- MSABrowser: dynamic and fast visualization of sequence alignments, variations, and annotations 94%
- AnnSQL: A Python SQL-based package for fast large-scale single-cell genomics analysis using minimal computational resources 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.