Polygenic Embryo Screening: High Approval Despite Substantial Concerns from the U.S. Public
Furrer, R. A.; Barlevy, D.; Pereira, S.; Carmi, S.; Lencz, T.; Lazaro-Munoz, G.
Show abstract
Polygenic embryo screening (PES) is a novel - yet commercially available - technology that can compute genetic likelihood estimates of polygenic conditions (e.g., diabetes, depression) and traits (e.g., height, cognitive ability) in embryos. Patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) can use these polygenic scores to select which embryos to transfer for implantation with the goal of having a child. We conducted a survey of the U.S. public to examine attitudes toward PES encompassing acceptance, interest, potential uses, and concerns (n=1435). Our results indicate 72% public approval for PES, with 82% expressing some interest in using PES if already undergoing IVF. Approval for using PES for embryo selection is notably high for physical health (77%) and psychiatric conditions (72%). In contrast, there is minority approval for embryo selection based on PES for behavioral traits (36%) and physical traits (30%). Nevertheless, concerns about PES leading to false expectations, eugenic practices, and stigma are pronounced (54-55% find them "very" to "extremely" concerning). In a second sample of participants (n=192), presenting concerns at survey onset (vs. end) reduced approval (-28%) by mostly increasing ambivalence (+24%), and only slightly increasing disapproval (+4%). Given its commercial availability, practical limitations, and ethical concerns among physicians, patients, geneticists, bioethicists, and legal scholars, it is notable that there is such high public approval and interest in using PES. Understanding these attitudes is essential for informing policymakers, healthcare professionals, and researchers about the publics perspectives on this novel biotechnology and debate about the role of medicine in regulating the use of PES.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Community Attitudes on Genetic Research of Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation, and Mental Health 93%
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 91%
- Translation, adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Abortion Attitude Scale - a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study among medical students 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining the Critical Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: A Delphi Study 93%
- Practical barriers and facilitators experienced by patients, pharmacists and physicians to the implementation of pharmacogenomic screening in Dutch outpatient hospital care – an explorative pilot study 88%
- The Contribution of Pharmacogenetic Drug Interactions to 90-Day Hospital Readmissions: Preliminary Results from a Real-World Healthcare System 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole-exome sequencing analysis on products of conception: A cohort study to evaluate clinical utility and genetic etiology for pregnancy loss 91%
- Development and evaluation of a novel educational program for providers on the use of polygenic risk scores 90%
- Return of Results in a Global Sample of Psychiatric Genetics Researchers: Practices, Attitudes, and Knowledge 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Qualitative Study Exploring the Consumer Experience of Receiving Self-Initiated Polygenic Risk Scores from a Third-Party Website 91%
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 91%
- Benefits and barriers to implementing precision preventive care: results of a national physician survey 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Harnessing endogenous repair mechanisms for targeted gene knock-in of bovine embryos 90%
- Widely accessible prognostication using medical history for fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age in nationwide insured women 90%
- Targeted gene expression profiling for accurate endometrial receptivity testing 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.