Emulating a target trial to assess effect modification: an application to obesity in the comparative effectiveness and safety of apixaban versus warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation using electronic health records
Bin Hammad, T. M.; Powell, E.; Baptiste, P. J.; Douglas, I.; Wing, K.
Show abstract
Anticoagulation therapy is recommended for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and an increased risk of stroke. Although apixaban showed superiority over warfarin in the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) study, little is known about their effects in overweight and obese patients, with concerns that obesity might undermine apixabans effects due to the fixed dosing across body mass index (BMI) groups. We emulated a target trial similar to the ARISTOTLE study using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) linked data to estimate the 36-month risk ratios (RR) and risk differences of the effects of apixaban compared to warfarin in NVAF patients in a composite of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding and all-cause mortality. In 55,826 patients, apixaban did not differ across groups of BMI in stroke/SE with RR (95% CI) of 1.15 (0.81, 1.62) in normal weight, 1.06 (0.70, 1.61) in overweight and 1.23 (0.69, 2.17) in obese patients. In major bleeding, apixaban was not superior to warfarin in the normal weight group (RR (95% CI) 1.10 (0.76, 1.60) but superior in overweight (RR (95% CI) 0.73 (0.57, 0.93) and obese (RR (95 % CI) 0.67 (0.52, 0.87) groups. In NVAF, the effectiveness and safety of apixaban compared to warfarin were consistent across BMI groups.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Bleeding in cardiac patients prescribed antithrombotic drugs: Electronic health record phenotyping algorithms, incidence, trends and prognosis 94%
- Polygenic Risk Score Improves the Accuracy of a Clinical Risk Score for Coronary Artery Disease 92%
- Are Statins Optimally Prescribed to Reduce Stroke Risk in Patients with Hypercholesterolaemia? A population-based Longitudinal Study Using Electronic Health Records in South London (2005-2021) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benzodiazepine Initiation Effect on Mortality Among Medicare Beneficiaries Post Acute Ischemic Stroke 93%
- Background rates of five thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndromes of special interest for COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance: incidence between 2017 and 2019 and patient profiles from 20.6 million people in six European countries 92%
- Bias amplification of unobserved confounding in pharmacoepidemiological studies using indication-based sampling: there is no free lunch in restricting the sample to those with a particular drug-indication 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large-scale validation of the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) using a short form: high risk of bias models show poorer discrimination 93%
- Clinical Trials in COVID-19 Management & Prevention: A Meta-epidemiological Study examining methodological quality 93%
- High-cited favorable studies for COVID-19 treatments ineffective in large trials 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Biomarker panels for improved risk prediction and enhanced biological insights in patients with atrial fibrillation 94%
- Dimethyl fumarate in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial 93%
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist in Large Vessel Occlusion Treated by Reperfusion Therapy: A Phase 2 Randomized Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.