Back

Enhancing immunotherapy outcomes in glioblastoma through predictive machine learning.

mestrallet, g.

2023-10-06 oncology
10.1101/2023.10.05.23296617 medRxiv
Show abstract

Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive cancer associated with a dismal prognosis, with a mere 5% of patients surviving beyond five years post-diagnosis. Current therapeutic modalities encompass surgical intervention, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICB). However, the efficacy of ICB remains limited in glioblastoma patients, necessitating a proactive approach to anticipate treatment response and resistance. In this comprehensive study, we conducted a rigorous analysis involving two distinct glioblastoma patient cohorts subjected to PD-1 blockade treatments. Our investigation unveiled that a significant portion, 60%, of patients exhibit persistent disease progression despite ICB intervention. To elucidate the underpinnings of resistance, we characterized the immune profiles of glioblastoma patients with continued cancer progression following anti-PD1 therapy. These profiles revealed multifaceted defects, encompassing compromised macrophage, monocyte, and T follicular helper responses, impaired antigen presentation, aberrant regulatory T cell (Tregs) responses, and heightened expression of immunosuppressive molecules (TGFB, IL2RA, and CD276). Building upon these resistance profiles, we leveraged cutting-edge machine learning algorithms to develop predictive models and accompanying software. This innovative computational tool achieved remarkable success, accurately forecasting the progression status of 82.82% of glioblastoma patients following ICB, based on their unique immune characteristics. In conclusion, our pioneering approach advocates for the personalization of immunotherapy in glioblastoma patients. By harnessing patient-specific attributes and computational predictions, we offer a promising avenue for the enhancement of clinical outcomes in the realm of immunotherapy. This paradigm shift towards tailored therapies underscores the potential to revolutionize the management of glioblastoma, opening new horizons for improved patient care.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
4
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
9
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
12
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
13
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.3%
16
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
20
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
22
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
23
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
26
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.7%