Attention-dependent coupling with forebrain and brainstem neuromodulatory nuclei changes across the lifespan
Cicero, N. G.; Riley, E.; Swallow, K.; De Rosa, E.; Anderson, A. K.
Show abstract
Attentional states continuously reflect the predictability and uncertainty in ones environment having important consequences for learning and memory. Beyond well known cortical contributions, rapid shifts in attention are hypothesized to also originate from deep nuclei, such as the basal forebrain (BF) and locus coeruleus (LC) neuromodulatory systems. These systems are also the first to change with aging. Here we characterized the interplay between these systems and their regulation of afferent targets - the hippocampus (HPC) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) - across the lifespan. To examine the role of attentional salience on task-dependent functional connectivity, we used a target-distractor go/no go task presented during functional MRI. In younger adults, BF coupling with the HPC, and LC coupling with the PCC, increased with behavioral relevance (targets vs distractors). Although the strength and presence of significant regional coupling changed in middle age, the most striking change in network connectivity was in old age, such that in older adults BF and LC coupling with their cortical afferents was largely absent and replaced by stronger interconnectivity between LC-BF nuclei. Overall rapid changes in attention related to behavioral relevance revealed distinct roles of subcortical neuromodulatory systems. The pronounced changes in functional network architecture across the lifespan suggest a decrease in these distinct roles, with deafferentation of cholinergic and noradrenergic systems associated with a shift towards mutual support during attention guided to external stimuli. Significance statementChanges in attentional control across the lifespan may originate from cortical control networks or subcortical neuromodulatory systems, which are the first sites of age-related neuropathology. In young adults, we demonstrated functional coupling of the basal forebrain with the hippocampus, and locus coeruleus with the posterior cingulate cortex varies with task relevance. This coupling changed in middle age and most strikingly in older adults. In old age, task-dependent coupling between the locus coeruleus and basal forebrain was the predominant connection remaining within the observed network. Older adults exhibit reduced subcortical-cortical connectivity, consistent with a relative neuromodulatory deafferentation, replaced by subcortical-subcortical deep nuclear connectivity. This alteration in noradrenergic and cholinergic signaling has important implications for attention and memory formation and neurocognitive aging.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic network features of functional and structural brain networks support visual working memory in aging adults 98%
- Dedifferentiation of caudate functional organization is linked to reduced D1 dopamine receptor availability and poorer memory function in aging 98%
- When Age Tips the Balance: a Dual Mechanism Affecting Hemispheric Specialization for Language 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Frontal Vulnerability vs. Temporal Resilience within the core Language Network : Neuro-compensatory mechanisms underline differential language aging trajectories 97%
- Temporal and Spatial Scales of Human Resting-state Cortical Activity Across the Lifespan 96%
- Neural contributions to reduced fluid intelligence across the adult lifespan 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Age-related Structural and Functional Variations in 5967 Individuals across the Adult Lifespan 96%
- Voxel-wise Intermodal Coupling Analysis of Two or More Modalities using Local Covariance Decomposition 96%
- Functionally annotated electrophysiological neuromarkers of healthy ageing and memory function 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.