Afferents to Action: Cortical proprioceptive processing assessed with corticokinematic coherence specifically predicts gross motor skills
Mongold, S. J.; Georgiev, C.; Legrand, T.; Bourguignon, M.
Show abstract
Voluntary motor control is thought to be predicated on the ability to efficiently integrate and process somatosensory afferent information. However, current approaches in the field of motor control have not factored in objective markers of how the brain actually tracks incoming somatosensory information. Here, we asked whether motor performance relates with such markers obtained with an analysis of the coupling between peripheral kinematics and cortical oscillations during continuous movements, best known as corticokinematic coherence (CKC). Motor performance was evaluated by measuring both gross and fine motor skills using the Box and Blocks Test (BBT) and the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT), respectively, and with a biomechanics measure of coordination. Sixty-one participants completed the BBT, while equipped with electroencephalography and electromyography, and the PPT. We evaluated CKC, from the signals collected during the BBT, as the coherence between movement rhythmicity and brain activity, and coordination as the cross-correlation between muscle activity. CKC at movements first harmonic was positively associated with BBT scores, and showed a relationship with PPT scores, but only in synergy with BBT scores, where participants with lower PPT score had higher CKC than expected based on their BBT score. Coordination was not associated with motor performance and at most, weakly related to CKC. These findings demonstrate that cortical somatosensory processing in the form of strengthened brain-peripheral coupling is specifically associated with better gross motor skills. CKC might be considered as a valuable addition to classical tests of proprioceptive acuity, with important perspectives for future clinical studies and practice. Significance StatementWhether standing upright, jogging, or in Olympic competition, our nervous system not only sends out motor commands prompting muscles to contract, but also receives incoming information to fine-tune motor actions. Though the machinery involved in sensing mechanical changes is well-described, the neural processing of this information is not, making its relevance to motor function unresolved. We found that the coupling strength between peripheral kinematics and cortical activity was related to motor function and at most, only weakly related to conventional muscle-only assessments. We present novel behavioral relevance of this coupling and its specific relationship to gross motor skill. Our study paves the way for including novel brain-centered approaches to complement classical assessment sensorimotor functions in health and disease.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mobile EEG reveals functionally dissociable dynamic processes supporting real-world ambulatory obstacle avoidance: Evidence for early proactive control 96%
- Alteration of brain dynamics during natural dual-task walking 96%
- Cumulative distribution functions: An alternative approach to examine the triggering of prepared motor actions in the StartReact effect 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The bodily appearance of a virtual partner affects the activity of the action observation and action monitoring systems in a minimally interactive task 96%
- Neural filtering of physiological tremor oscillations to spinal motor neurons mediates short-term acquisition of a skill learning task 95%
- Variations in clustering of multielectrode local field potentials in the motor cortex of macaque monkeys during a reach-and-grasp task 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cortical Silent Period reflects individual differences in action stopping performance. 95%
- Enhanced mirroring upon mutual gaze: Multimodal evidence from TMS-assessed corticospinal excitability and the EEG mu rhythm 95%
- When mechanical engineering inspired from physiology improves postural-related somatosensory processes 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.