Back

Cost-Benefit Analysis for Universal Cataract Coverage in India for 2018

Arora, A.; Zadey, S.; Vuddemarry, M.; Iyer, H.; Nimkar, P.

2023-09-25 ophthalmology
10.1101/2023.09.24.23296031 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCataract is the leading cause of curable blindness in India. We estimated enhanced coverage scale-up costs, societal value of health lost to cataract, and net benefits of covering surgery needs. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis for India and its 30 states. Data was taken from Global Burden of Disease 2019, National Health Profile 2020, and National Health Accounts 2021. We used ten surgery costs. Enhanced coverage costs for the total need were calculated by multiplying prevalence by costs. For unmet need, the difference between the prevalence and surgeries achieved was used. For societal value of health lost to cataract, we multiplied disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) with non-health GDP per capita. DALYs for unmet needs were calculated by multiplying DALYs with ratio of unmet to total needs. For net benefits, enhanced coverage costs were subtracted from societal value of health lost to cataract. ResultsThe annual national enhanced coverage costs for covering total and unmet needs were 0.92 - 4.9 and 0.72 - 3.82 billion USD, respectively. The societal value of health lost to total and unmet cataract burden was 12.4 (95% UI: 8.9 - 16.7) and 9.7 (95% UI: 6.93 - 13) billion USD, respectively. Annual net benefits of covering total needs and unmet needs were 7.53 - 11.5 and 5.9 - 9 billion USD, respectively. ConclusionIncreasing coverage for cataract surgery is financially beneficial to the public health sector. This can be done through public sector service or government-funded or social health insurance expansion.

Published in Journal of Global Health Economics and Policy · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.