Caring for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of Literature on the Stress Experienced by Family Caregivers
Jhang, K.; Luh, D.-L.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThis research takes previous study, Cancer family caregivers during the palliative, hospice, and bereavement phases: A review of the descriptive psychosocial literature, limited in recent decade, as methodology template. The purpose of this review was to organize the literature as compared to the different result of previous study. MethodAs a systematic review, major databases were searched for non-intervention descriptive studies. Psychosocial variables of family caregivers to adults with cancer during the different phases would be included. ResultThe 23 studies reviewed were conducted in ten countries and varied considerably by samples, outcome measures, and results. Despite limiting several conditions, results, such as age, gender, and relationship to the patient, were inconsistent. Across the 23 studies, 53 unique instruments were used; 13 of which were no psychometric testing. The family caregivers who were younger and faced level of daily life impairment tended to be burden, anxious, depress. To summarize the different factors influencing caregivers status, complicated grief was consistent with their situation. ConclusionAs comparewith previous study, it demonstrated inconsistent results, which were spouse, gender and age, affecting family caregivers status. However, regarding to measurement instruments using, it was much more rigorous than before. Also, it had been changed in the major study site and the number of study. As a consequence of physical and psychosocial status of family caregivers, they were in high risk population.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Socio-demographic characteristics and their relation to medical service consumption among elderly in Israel during the COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 compared to the corresponding period in 2019 96%
- Health-related quality of life of adult COVID-19 patients following one-month illness experience since diagnosis: findings of a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh 95%
- Family Vulnerability Scale: evidence of content and internal structure validity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acculturation stressors and academic adjustment among Nepalese students in South Korean higher education institutions 95%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 95%
- Prevalence of Mental Health Disorders among Elderly Diabetics and Associated Risk Factors in Indonesia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anxiety, depression, and insomnia among nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19: A multicenter cross-sectional analysis of the high-income region in China 94%
- Health literacy profiles correlate with participation in primary health care among patients with chronic diseases: A latent profile analysis 94%
- Digital Health Interventions and Quality of Home-based Primary Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Family physicians supporting patients with palliative care needs within the Patient Medical Home in the community: An Appreciative Inquiry qualitative study 94%
- Comparison of Care Utilization and Medical Institutional Death among Older Adults by Home Care Facility Type: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Fukuoka, Japan 94%
- Relationship Between Adverse Events Prevalence, Patient Safety Culture And Patient Safety Perception In A Single Sample Of Patients: A Cross-Sectional And Correlational Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges to self-isolation among contacts of cases of COVID-19: a national telephone survey in Wales 92%
- Health Insurance Support on Maternal Health Care: Evidence from Survey Data in India 92%
- Financial toxicity among cancer patients, survivors, and their families in the United Kingdom: a scoping review 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.