Documented Goals of Care Conversations with Hospitalized Patients after Severe Stroke
Comer, A.; Bartlett, S.; Holloway, R. G.; Creutzfeldt, C. J.; Williams, L. S.; Slaven, J.; D'Cruz, L.; endris, k.; Marchand, M.; Toor, S.; Waite, C.; Jawed, A.; Torke, A.
Show abstract
Documented Goals of Care Conversations with Hospitalized Patients after Severe StrokeO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSIdentifying goals of care is important for patients suffering severe ischemic stroke (SIS) and their caregivers to ensure patient- and family-centered treatment decisions. This study sought to determine the prevalence and patient predictors associated with having a documented goals-of-care conversation (dGOCC) after SIS. MethodsWe reviewed the medical charts of all patients with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) [≥]10 admitted to four hospitals in the Midwestern US. In addition to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, we searched for dGOCC during the acute stroke hospitalization, defined as any documented conversation or meeting that addressed one or more of the following domains: prognostic information, treatment plan, patient preferences and values, quality of life, or establishing goals. We determined prevalence, frequency, timing, and content of dGOCCs. Additionally, we obtained information on treatment utilization and outcomes. ResultsAmong 1297 patients, 26.5% (n=344) had at least one dGOCC. Treatment plan was the most discussed domain (n=264, 20% of all patients) and was the most common first dGOCC (n=207, 60% of first conversations). Median day for first dGOCC was on hospital day zero. Patient preferences, values, and goals were documented in 112 (8.6%) of all patients charts and quality of life conversations were documented in only 61 (4.7%) charts. In multivariate analysis, having a NIHSS [≥]21 (OR 1.46, p-value.01) was associated with having a dGOCC. ConclusionAfter severe stroke, most patients do not have a dGOCC, despite the important decisions that often arise about treatment and rehabilitation. Documentation of patient preferences, values and goals are even rarer. This suggests missed opportunities for high quality decision making informed by patient goals to improve person centered care.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterizing upper extremity motor behavior in the first week after stroke 93%
- Leveraging Machine Learning for Enhanced and Interpretable Risk Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care 93%
- Information, Involvement, Self-care and Support - The Needs of Caregivers of People with Stroke: A Grounded Theory Approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk Factor Stratification for Postoperative Delirium: A Retrospective Database Study 90%
- Decreased door-to-balloon time in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction during the early COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea – an observational study 89%
- Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Pediatric COVID-19 in Arkansas: March-December 2020 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- When two communication differences intersect: Comparing inpatient rehabilitation care and outcomes for people with post-stroke aphasia who do and do not require an interpreter 96%
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 95%
- Normobaric Hyperoxia Combined with Endovascular Treatment Based on Temporal Gradient: A dose-escalation study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.