Machine learning based prediction of prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation incorporating medication data
Sikora, A.; Zhao, B.; Kong, Y.; Murray, B.; Shen, Y.
Show abstract
RationaleDuration of mechanical ventilation is associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients and increased use of resources. The increasing complexity of medication regimens has been associated with increased mortality, length of stay, and fluid overload but has never been studied specifically in the setting of mechanical ventilation. ObjectiveThe purpose of this analysis was to develop prediction models for mechanical ventilation duration to test the hypothesis that incorporating medication data may improve model performance. MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of adults admitted to the ICU and undergoing mechanical ventilation for longer than 24 hours from October 2015 to October2020. Patients were excluded if it was not their index ICU admission or if the patient was placed on comfort care in the first 24 hours of admission. Relevant patient characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, admission diagnosis, morbidities, vital signs measurements, severity of illness, medication regimen complexity as measured by the MRC-ICU, and medical treatments before intubation were collected. The primary outcome was area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of prediction models for prolonged mechanical ventilation (defined as greater than 5 days). Both logistic regression and supervised learning techniques including XGBoost, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine were used to develop prediction models. ResultsThe 318 patients [age 59.9 (SD 16.9), female 39.3%, medical 28.6%] had mean 24-hour MRC-ICU score of 21.3 (10.5), mean APACHE II score of 21.0 (5.4), mean SOFA score of 9.9 (3.3), and ICU mortality rate of 22.6% (n=72). The strongest performing logistic model was the base model with MRC-ICU added, with AUROC of 0.72, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.83, and negative prediction value (NPV) of 0.92. The strongest overall model was Random Forest with an AUROC of 0.78, a PPV of 0.53, and NPV of 0.90. Feature importance analysis using support vector machine and Random Forest revealed severity of illness scores and medication related data were the most important predictors. ConclusionsMedication regimen complexity is significantly associated with prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients, and prediction models incorporating medication information showed modest improvement in this prediction.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- ABCDEF Bundle Implementation: The influence of access to bundle-enhancing supplies and equipment 94%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 93%
- Early Tocilizumab Dosing is Associated with Improved Survival In Critically Ill Patients Infected With Sars-CoV-2 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Associations with Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in COVID-19 Patients upon Admission: A Model for Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in 329 Unvaccinated, Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients 96%
- Identification of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome subphenotypes denovo using routine clinical data: a retrospective analysis of ARDS clinical trials 94%
- Helmet noninvasive ventilation for COVID-19 patients (Helmet-COVID): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning vs. traditional regression analysis for fluid overload prediction in the ICU 95%
- Imputation of PaO2 from SpO2 values from the MIMIC-III Critical Care Database Using Machine-Learning Based Algorithms 94%
- AKI Risk Score (AKI-RiSc): Developing an Interpretable Clinical Score for Early Identification of Acute Kidney Injury for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.