A systematic review of genome-wide association studies on bladder cancer
Ahmad, A. A.; Muhammad, U.; Ibrahim, B.; Kwairanga, S. H.; Garkuwa, U. A.; Jibril, M. M.; Ahmad, U.
Show abstract
BackgroundBladder cancer (BC) is the most common cancer of the urinary tract worldwide with over 550,000 new cases each year, bladder cancer has drawn relatively limited research attention and healthcare interventions despite the escalating incidence and mortality rates, particularly in Africa. Historically, the clinical handling of bladder cancer remained largely unchanged for many years. However, novel research initiatives have heralded a fresh epoch in its diagnosis and treatment, fueled by detailed probing of molecular changes. AimThis study aimed to identify genetic susceptibility loci associated with bladder cancer by systematically reviewing previous Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS). MethodsIn line with this objective, comprehensive literature searches were conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and relevant genetic databases, focusing on bladder cancer GWAS studies from 2000 through to November 2022. This systematic review adhered to the robust PRISMA standards. To evaluate the credibility of the studies under scrutiny, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was employed, further assessing any potential bias risk. ResultsThe investigation identified chromosome 18q12.3 as the most vulnerable to bladder cancer, revealing four polymorphisms at this locus: rs7238033, rs10775480, rs11082469, and rs17674580. Furthermore, chromosome 5p15.3 emerged as the second most susceptible, with three noted polymorphisms: rs2736098 and two instances of rs401681. ConclusionDespite these findings, our understanding of genetic predisposition to bladder cancer remains rudimentary, with the majority of substantial data deriving from GWAS. No additional genetic association evidence emerged from this systematic review. Given the relatively minor influence of our current knowledge of genetic susceptibility to bladder cancer on public health, a call for larger cohort studies is necessary. These expanded studies can potentially unveil a broader range of significant polymorphisms across the genome, thereby enhancing our understanding and approach to bladder cancer.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of the rs1042522 SNP with prostate cancer risk: a study of cancer tissues, primary tumor cultures and serum samples from a European Caucasian population 92%
- Syngeneic model of carcinogen-induced tumor mimics basal/squamous, stromal-rich, and neuroendocrine molecular and immunological features of muscle-invasive bladder cancer 91%
- Systems biomedicine of primary and metastatic colorectal cancer reveals potential therapeutic targets 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expression of Spred2 in the urothelial tumorigenesis of the urinary bladder 93%
- Diagnostic value of circulating tumor DNA as an effective biomarker in cervical cancer: a meta-analysis 92%
- The impact of positive surgical margin parameters and pathological stage on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine-learning-based determination of sex-related bladder cancer biomarkers 93%
- An algorithm for drug discovery based on deep learning with an example of developing a drug for the treatment of lung cancer 88%
- Predicting GD2 expression across cancer types by the integration of pathway topology and transcriptome data 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional signatures in non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex-based differences in transcriptomic studies 92%
- Loss of CHGA protein as a potential biomarker for colon cancer diagnosis: a study on biomarker discovery by machine learning and confirmation by immunohistochemistry in colorectal cancer tissue microarrays 91%
- WNT and TGF-Beta Pathway Alterations in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Among Hispanic/Latino Populations 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.