Back

The eSAH Score: A Simple Practical Predictive Model for SAH Mortality & Outcomes.

Sharma, R.; Mandl, D.; Foettinger, F.; Salman, S.; Godasi, R.; Wei, Y.; Tawk, R.; Freeman, W. D.

2023-09-17 neurology
10.1101/2023.09.15.23295634 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWe developed a simple quantifiable scoring system that predicts aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) mortality, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and modified Rankin Scale outcomes using readily available SAH admission clinical data with a new radiographic quantitative volumetric SAH method. MethodsWe analyzed 277 patients with aneurysmal SAH (aSAH) admitted at our Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC) at Mayo Clinic Florida between 2012 and 2022. We developed a mathematical model that measures aSAH basal cisternal subarachnoid hemorrhage volume (SAHV) using a derivation of the ABC/2 ellipsoid formula, where A = width/thickness, B = length, C = vertical extension) on non-contrast CT (NCCT), which we previously demonstrated comparable to pixel based manual segmentation on NCCT scans. Data was analyzed using t-test, chi-square, receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve, and area under curve analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with stepwise elimination of variables not contributing to the model (0.05 significance level for entry into the model) was used to develop an enhanced SAH (eSAH) scoring system. ResultsUsing regression and logistic regression, we found that age, GCS score and SAHV were significantly associated with final discharge outcome, prediction on in-hospital DCI, and in-hospital mortality. A weighted eSAH score was developed using these factors that ranged between 0-5 and was strongly predictive of outcome (AUC=0.88), DCI (AUC=0.75) and in-hospital mortality (AUC=0.87). ConclusionsA volumetrically-enhanced SAH (eSAH) score is a simple quantitative model based on SAH volumetrics, GCS and age and appears to predict mortality and outcomes in SAH patients. A larger cohort validation study is planned.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.8%
2
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
Neurocritical Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
4
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
6
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
10
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
12
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
BioMed Research International
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
14
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
Health Science Reports
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
Stroke
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
20
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
22
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Journal of Neurotrauma
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
24
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%