The autonomic effects of transcutaneous auricular nerve stimulation at different sites on the external auricle of the ear
Bretherton, B.; Murray, A.; Deuchars, S.; Deuchars, J.
Show abstract
Transcutaneous auricular nerve stimulation (tANS) applied to specific parts of the external ear has positive health effects in both healthy volunteers and patient groups. However, due to differences between studies in ear stimulation sites and extent of effect on autonomic variables, it is challenging to determine what part of the external ear is the optimum site for electrode placement. This study investigated the autonomic effects of bilateral tANS at four different sites on the external auricle of the ear: tragus, cymba concha, helix and earlobe. tANS was performed using modified surface electrodes connected to a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) machine. Participants (n = 24) each underwent four sessions where a 15 minute period of stimulation (pulse width: 200 s; pulse frequency: 30 Hz; current: adjusted to sensory threshold) was applied bilaterally to either the tragus, cymba concha, helix or earlobe. Heart rate and blood pressure were continuously recorded during 10-minute baseline, 15-minute stimulation and 10-minute recovery periods. Heart rate variability (HRV) was derived. Results showed that regardless of site, stimulation significantly influenced measures of HRV. Baseline LF/HF ratio predicted change in LF/HF ratio during stimulation for each site and for all sites combined. Response (i.e. change in LF/HF ratio between baseline and stimulation) was closely linked with measures reflecting starting autonomic function. This demonstrates the importance of evaluating how autonomic function is modulated by tANS in individual participants (as well as the whole group). These findings have key implications for adopting a tailored approach when considering the therapeutic/clinical applications of tANS.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a novel startle response task in Duchenne muscular dystrophy 94%
- Optimal sigmoid function models for analysis of transspinal evoked potential recruitment curves recorded from different muscles 93%
- Vibrotactile auricular vagus nerve stimulation alters limbic system connectivity in humans: A pilot study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation enhances emotional bias towards happiness in healthy young adults: A comparative study of electrical and ultrasound stimulation 94%
- Intraoperative laryngeal muscle and heart rate responses to implanted vagus nerve stimulation 92%
- Towards optimization of oscillatory stimulation during sleep 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- EEG-based diagnostics of the auditory system using cochlear implant electrodes as sensors 92%
- Evaluation of emotional arousal level and depression severity using the centripetal force derived from voice 92%
- On the Use of Envelope Following Responses to Estimate Peripheral Level Compression in the Auditory System 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Speech in noise performance in adults with cochlear implants using a combined channel deactivation strategy with a variable number of dynamic focused channels 94%
- Effects of Electrical Pulse Polarity Shape on Intra Cochlear Neural Responses in Humans: Triphasic Pulses with Anodic and Cathodic Second Phase 94%
- The Audible Contrast Threshold (ACT™) test: a clinical spectro-temporal modulation detection test 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel Application of a Force Sensor during Sit-to-Stands to Measure Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation Onset 90%
- Positive Rate Dependent Action Potential Prolongation By Modulating Potassium Ion Channels 89%
- Multichannel Modulation of Depolarizing and Repolarizing Ion Currents Increases the Positive Rate Dependence of Action Potential Prolongation 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.