Back

Comparing the Performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 versus a Cohort of Medical Students on an Official University of Toronto Undergraduate Medical Education Progress Test

Meaney, C.; Huang, R. S.; Lu, K.; Fischer, A. W.; Leung, F.-H.; Kulasegaram, K.; Tzanetos, K.; Punnett, A.

2023-09-14 medical education
10.1101/2023.09.14.23295571 medRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSLarge language model (LLM) based chatbots have recently received broad social uptake; demonstrating remarkable abilities in natural language understanding, natural language generation, dialogue, and logic/reasoning. ObjectiveTo compare the performance of two LLM-based chatbots, versus a cohort of medical students, on a University of Toronto undergraduate medical progress test. MethodsWe report the mean number of correct responses, stratified by year of training/education, for each cohort of undergraduate medical students. We report counts/percentages of correctly answered test questions for each of ChatGPT and GPT-4. We compare the performance of ChatGPT versus GPT-4 using McNemars test for dependent proportions. We compare whether the percentage of correctly answered test questions for ChatGPT or GPT-4 fall within/outside the confidence intervals for the mean number of correct responses for each of the cohorts of undergraduate medical education students. ResultsA total of N=1057 University of Toronto undergraduate medical students completed the progress test during the Fall-2022 and Winter-2023 semesters. Student performance improved with increased training/education levels: UME-Year1 mean=36.3%; UME-Year2 mean=44.1%; UME-Year3 mean=52.2%; UME-Year4 mean=58.5%. ChatGPT answered 68/100 (68.0%) questions correctly; whereas, GPT-4 answered 79/100 (79.0%) questions correctly. GPT-4 performance was statistically significantly greater than ChatGPT (P=0.034). GPT-4 performed at a level equivalent to the top performing undergraduate medical student (79/100 questions correctly answered). ConclusionsThis study adds to a growing body of literature demonstrating the remarkable performance of LLM-based chatbots on medical tests. GPT-4 performed at a level comparable to the best performing undergraduate medical student who attempted the progress test in 2022/2023. Future work will investigate the potential application of LLM-chatbots as tools for assisting learners/educators in medical education.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.