Back

Cell context-specific Synthetic lethality Prediction and Mechanism Analysis

XIn, Y.; Pu, M.; Tian, K.; Cheng, K.; Wei, L.; Zheng, W.; Peng, G.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Y.

2023-09-17 cancer biology
10.1101/2023.09.13.557545 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Synthetic lethality (SL) holds significant promise as a targeted cancer therapy by selectively eliminating tumor cells while sparing normal cells. However, the discovery of SL gene pairs has encountered tremendous challenges, including high costs and low efficiency of experimental methods. Current computational approaches only provide limited insights because of overlooking the crucial aspects of cellular context dependency and mechanistic understanding of SL pairs. To overcome these challenges, we have developed SLWise, a deep-learning model capable of predicting SL interactions in diverse cellular backgrounds. We evaluated SLWise using a real world ground truth standard. The evaluation demonstrated that SLWise outperformed benchmark models in SL prediction. Additionally, we proposed a novel analysis scheme called SLAD-CE (Synthetic Lethal Associated Gene Detection and Cell Damage Evaluation) for the identification of abnormal essential genes induced by SL gene pairs and tracking the extent of cell damage. Leveraging the cell-line-specific input feature L1000 and employing Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), SLAD-CE provides valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms of SLWise-predicted gene pairs. The combined utilization of SLWise and SLAD-CE offers an approach for predicting and analyzing SL interactions in specific cellular contexts. Our findings highlight the potential of SLWise and SLAD-CE in advancing SL-based therapies by improving prediction accuracy and enhancing mechanistic understanding, ultimately contributing to the development of effective precision treatments for cancer.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.