Back

Social Determinants of Genetics Referral and Completion Rates Among Child Neurology Patients

Cole, J. J.; Sellitto, A. D.; Baratta, L. R.; Huecker, J. B.; Balls-Berry, J. E.; Gurnett, C. A.

2023-09-13 neurology
10.1101/2023.09.12.23295450 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate clinical, social, and systems-level determinants predictive of genetics clinic referral and completion of genetics clinic visits among child neurology patients. MethodsElectronic health record data were extracted from patients 0-18 years old who were evaluated in child neurology clinics at a single tertiary care institution between July 2018 to January 2020. Variables aligned with the Health Equity Implementation Framework. Referral and referral completion rates to genetics and cardiology clinics were compared among Black vs White patients using bivariate analysis. Demographic variables associated with genetics clinic referral and visit completion were identified using logistic regressions. ResultsIn a cohort of 11,371 child neurology patients, 304 genetics clinic referrals and 82 cardiology clinic referrals were placed. In multivariate analysis of patients with Black or White ethnoracial identity (n=10,601), genetics clinic referral rates did not differ by race, but were significantly associated with younger age, rural address, neurodevelopmental disorder diagnosis, number of neurology clinic visits, and provider type. The only predictors of genetics clinic visit completion number of neurology clinic visits and race/ethnicity, with White patients being twice as likely as Black patients to complete the visit. Cardiology clinic referrals and visit completion did not differ by race/ethnicity. InterpretationAlthough race/ethnicity was not associated with differences in genetics clinic referral rates, White patients were twice as likely as Black patients to complete a genetics clinic visit after referral. Further work is needed to determine whether this is due to systemic/structural racism, differences in attitudes toward genetic testing, or other factors.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
2
Pediatric Neurology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
5
Movement Disorders
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.6%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Journal of Pediatrics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
9
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
10
Neurology Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
13
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.1%
16
Epilepsia Open
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Pediatrics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
18
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Human Molecular Genetics
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
22
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
25
Journal of Medical Genetics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
26
Genetics in Medicine Open
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
27
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
28
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
29
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
30
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%