Long- versus short-duration systemic corticosteroid regimens for acute exacerbations of COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials and cohort studies.
Zhao, Z.; Lou, O.; Wang, Y.; Yin, R.; Gong, C.; Deng, F.; Wu, E. C.; Xie, J. Y.; Wu, J.; Ma, A.; Guo, Y.; Xiong, W. T.
Show abstract
While systemic corticosteroids quicken patient recovery during acute exacerbations of COPD, they also have many adverse effects. The optimal duration of corticosteroid administration remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare patient outcomes between short-([≤]7 day) and long- (>7 day) corticosteroid regimens in adults with acute exacerbations of COPD. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and hand searches were used to identify eight eligible RCTs and three retrospective cohort studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and ROBINS-I. Data were summarized as odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) whenever possible and qualitatively described otherwise. A total of 11532 participants were included, with 1296 eligible for meta-analyses. Heterogeneity was present in the methodology and settings of the studies. The OR for mortality was 0.76 (95% CI=0.40-1.44, n=1055). The MD for hospital length-of-stay was -0.91 days (95% CI=-1.81--0.02 days, n=421). The OR for re-exacerbations was 1.31 (95% CI=0.90-1.90, n=552). The OR for hyperglycemia was 0.90 (95% CI=0.60-1.33, n=423). The OR for infection incidence was 0.96 (95% CI=0.59-1.156, n=389). The MD for one-second forced expiratory volume change was -18.40 mL (95% CI=-111.80-75.01 mL, n=161). The RCTs generally had low or unclear risks of bias, while the cohort studies had serious or moderate risks of bias. Our meta-analyses were affected by imprecision due to insufficient data. Some heterogeneity was present in the results, suggesting population, setting, and treatment details are potential prognostic factors. Our evidence suggests that short-duration treatments are not worse than long-duration treatments in moderate/severe exacerbations and may lead to considerably better outcomes in milder exacerbations. This supports the current GOLD guidelines for corticosteroid administration. No funding was given for this review. Our protocol is registered in PROSPERO: CRD42023374410.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduction in COPD exacerbations during COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis 97%
- Combination of ipratropium bromide and salbutamol in children and adolescents with asthma: a meta-analysis 95%
- Can we predict the severe course of COVID-19 – a systematic review and meta-analysis of indicators of clinical outcome? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adrenaline (epinephrine) compared to selective beta-2-agonist in adults or children with acute asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Long-Term Acceptability of Hygiene, Face Covering, and Social Distancing Interventions to Prevent Exacerbations in people living with Airways Diseases 92%
- A systematic review of Anakinra, Sarilumab, Siltuximab with meta-analysis of Tocilizumab for Covid-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Singing for lung health following completion of pulmonary rehabilitation - feasibility of a randomised controlled trial. 92%
- Investigating a structured diagnostic approach for chronic breathlessness in primary care: a mixed-methods feasibility cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. 92%
- Two-way remote monitoring allows effective and realistic provision of home-NIV to COPD patients with persistent hypercapnia 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 93%
- Optimal duration of antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a systematic review and duration-effect meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COPD in the time of COVID-19: An analysis of acute exacerbations and reported behavioural changes in patients with COPD 93%
- One year health outcomes associated with systemic corticosteroids for COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort study 92%
- Early prone positioning does not improve the outcome of patients with mild pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2: results from an open-label, randomized controlled trial (the EPCoT Study) 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.