Back

Disease prevalence, health-related and socio-demographic factors in the GCAT cohort. A comparison with the general population of Catalonia.

Blay, N.; Carrasco-Ribelles, L. A.; Farre, X.; Iraola-Guzman, S.; Danes-Castells, M.; Violan, C.; de Cid, R.

2023-09-08 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.09.08.23295239 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPopulation-based cohorts play a key role in epidemiological studies. However, it is known that volunteer cohorts include a healthy volunteer bias. Assessment and characterization of this bias is needed to extrapolate results to the general population. Here, we assess the bias of the population-based cohort GCAT, encompassing 20 000 adult participants from Catalonia with electronic health record data. The aim of this study is to compare the GCAT cohort with its age-matching Catalan population, to assess their representativeness, as well as determining the weights to make results generalisable. MethodsStatistical comparisons until 2019 in multiple variables across sociodemographic, lifestyle, diseases and medication domains were performed by stratified analysis with Fishers exact test and t-test. Electronic health records of Catalonia (SIDIAP), and registers from the statistics institute of Catalonia (IDESCAT) and Spain (INE) were used to make the comparisons. We generated weights accounting for sociodemographic, lifestyle and multimorbidity factors. ResultsGCAT cohort is enriched in women and younger individuals, with higher socioeconomic status, more health conscious and healthier in terms of mortality and chronic disease prevalence. We have shown that this bias can be corrected with weighting techniques, providing a more representative sample of the general population. ConclusionsThe application of multidomain weights, encompassing not only sociodemographic aspects, but also lifestyle and health-related variables, has effectively diminished the observed bias in disease prevalence estimates within the GCAT cohort. This correction has led to an enhancement of the cohorts representativeness, rendering it more akin to the general population of Catalonia.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.