Back

Vitamin D deficiency and toxicity across 2018 to 2022 in several cities of Ecuador: interrupted time series and a cross-sectional study

Tello, B.; Zurita-Salinas, C.; Duenas Espin, I.; Zurita, J.; Andrade-Munoz, J.; Pareja-Maldonado, J.; Acosta-Naranjo, W.; Aguilera-Leon, C.

2023-09-11 public and global health
10.1101/2023.09.08.23295127 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectivesto identify differences in mean vitamin D concentrations in samples obtained from a private laboratory in the city of Quito, and to explore their relationship with the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods spanning from 2018 to 2022. DesignA combination of an interrupted time series design and a retrospective cross-sectional approach Setting and participantsThe study involved 9,285 participants who had their 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels tested at a well-known private laboratory in Quito, Ecuador, from 2018 to 2022. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The 25(OH)D levels were analyzed and assessed for correlations with both age and the year in which the measurements were taken. ResultsThe mean 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) level was 27.53 ng/mL ({+/-} 14.11). Approximately 64.58% of participants had insufficient levels, below 20 ng/mL, and 0.62% showed potential harm from excess 25(OH)D, with levels over 100 ng/mL. The analysis indicated a significant monthly increase of 0.133 units in 25(OH)D levels (p=0.006). However, the period after March 2020, compared to before, saw a non-significant decrease of 1.605 units in mean 25(OH)D levels (p=0.477). ConclusionsThe studys findings indicate a significant prevalence of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) deficiency, underscoring the necessity for preventative measures. Nevertheless, the rise in cases of vitamin D toxicity is concerning, emphasizing the importance of prudent vitamin D supplement prescriptions and public education against self-medication. For efficient resource allocation and targeting those with higher risks, it may be advantageous to concentrate vitamin D testing on specific population groups.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.