Standardisation of cell-free DNA measurements: An International Study on Comparability of Low Concentration DNA Measurements using cancer variants
Burke, D.; Devonshire, A. S.; Pinheiro, L.; Jones, G.; Griffiths, K. R.; Fernandez-Gonzalez, A.; Forbes-Smith, M.; McLaughlin, J.; Emslie, K. R.; Weidner, C.; Mankertz, J.; Leguizamon Guerrero, J. E.; Medeiros, M. N. d.; Flatschart, R. B.; Saraiva, A. M.; Beltrao, P. J. I.; Divieto, C.; Revel, L.; Bae, Y.-K.; Dong, L.; Niu, C.; Wang, X.; Temisak, S.; Shibayama, S.; Yalcinkaya, B.; Akgoz, M.; Macdonald, R.; Plauth, A.; Huggett, J.
Show abstract
For the impact of genomic testing from liquid biopsies to be maximized, mechanisms to ensure reproducible and comparable test performance will be required. This can be established and maintained through reference measurement procedures and materials with property values that are internationally comparable through traceability to a common standard. To achieve this objective, an interlaboratory study was organised to explore digital PCR (dPCR) for standardisation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) quantification. Blinded samples of wild-type/variant mixtures of two DNA sequences (BRAF p.V600E single nucleotide variant or EGFR exon 19 deletion) were provided to 12 laboratories. Laboratories independently designed and applied dPCR assays to determine absolute and relative quantities, with no guidance provided to harmonise the approach. The mean and coefficient of variation (CV) of copy number concentrations for variant sequences were 18 copies/L (CV 7.2%) (BRAF variant sample) and 9 copies/L (CV 25%) (EGFR variant sample) while the mean variant allele frequencies (vAF) were 8.0% (CV 5.3%) and 0.080% (CV 29%) respectively. This study demonstrated that dPCR was capable of exceptional technical accuracy for variant copy number concentration and vAF, even when different assays and platforms were used. This implies that dPCR offers a unique analytical methodology that can be deployed globally in supporting comparability for cfDNA testing based on the existing framework of the International System of units of measurement.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a Pan-Cancer NGS Liquid Biopsy Test for Routine Hospital Use: An International Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation 94%
- Two Stage Hierarchical Group Testing Strategy to Increase SARS-CoV-2 Testing Capacity at an Institution of Higher Education: A Retrospective Analysis 93%
- Clinical validation of Whole Genome Sequencing for routine cancer diagnostics 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Limitations of qPCR to estimate DNA quantity: AnRFU method to facilitate inter-laboratory comparisonsfor activity level, and general applicability 93%
- RFU derived LRs for activity level assignments usingBayesian Networks 93%
- The ReAct project: Analysis of data from 23 different laboratories to characterise DNA recovery given two sets of activity level propositions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validating quantitative PCR assays for cell-free DNA detection without DNA extraction: Exercise induced kinetics in systemic lupus erythematosus patients 94%
- Recombinase Polymerase Amplification of Forensic Short Tandem Repeat Loci 93%
- Portable real-time colorimetric LAMP-device for rapidquantitative detection of nucleic acids in crude samples 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A SARS-CoV-2 Reference Standard Quantified by Multi-digital PCR Platforms for Quality Assessment of Molecular Tests 94%
- Virtual partition digital PCR for high precision chromosomal counting applications 93%
- Rapid identification of Sars-CoV-2 variants of concern using the portable peak PCR platform 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pushing beyond specifications: Evaluation of linearity and clinical performance of a fully automated SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay for reliable quantification in blood and other materials outside recommendations 94%
- CRISPR-cas13 enzymology rapidly detects SARS-CoV-2 fragments in a clinical setting 93%
- Is the glass half full? Extraction-free RT-LAMP to detect SARS-CoV-2 is less sensitive but highly specific compared to standard RT-PCR in 101 samples 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.