Back

Severe biventricular cardiomyopathy in both current and former long-term users of anabolic-androgenic steroids.

Abdullah, R.; Bjornebekk, A. K.; Hauger, L. E.; Hullstein, I. R.; Edvardsen, T.; Haugaa, K. I. H. H.; Almaas, V. M.

2023-09-06 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.09.06.23295123
Show abstract

AimsExplore the cardiovascular effects of long-term anabolic-androgenic steroid (AAS)-use in both current and former weightlifting AAS-users, and estimate the occurrence of severe reduced myocardial function and the impact of duration and amount of AAS. MethodsIn this cross-sectional study 101 weightlifting AAS-users with at least one year cumulative AAS-use (mean 11{+/-}7 accumulated years of AAS-use) were compared to 71 non-using weightlifting controls (WLC) using clinical data and echocardiography. ResultsSixty-nine were current, 30 former (> 1 year since quitted), and 2 AAS-users were not available for this classification. AAS-users had higher left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (106{+/-}26 versus 80{+/-}15 g/m2, P<0.001), worse LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (49{+/-}7 versus 59{+/-}5%, P<0.001) and right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) (-17.3{+/-}3.5 versus -22.8{+/-}2.0%, P<0.001), and higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) (141{+/-}17 vs. 133{+/-}11 mmHg, p<0.001) compared with WLC. In current users accumulated duration of AAS-use was 12{+/-}7 years, and in former 9{+/-}6 years (quitted 6{+/-}6 years earlier). Compared to WLC, LVMI and LVEF were pathological in current and former users (p<0.05) with equal distribution of severely reduced myocardial function (LVEF [&le;]40%) (11% vs. 10%, NS). In current users estimated life time AAS-dose correlated with reduced LVEF and LVGLS, p<0.05, but not with LVMI, p=0.12. Regression analyses of the total population showed that the strongest determinant of reduced LVEF were not coexisting strength training or hypertension, but history of AAS-use ({beta} -0.53, P<0.001). ConclusionsLong-term AAS-users showed severely biventricular cardiomyopathy. The reduced systolic function was also found upon discountied use.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 31%
15.6%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 1%
12.9%
3
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 1%
7.7%
4
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 33%
5.4%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 3%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
International Journal of Cardiology
based on 13 papers
Top 1.0%
3.0%
8
European Heart Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
9
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
10
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
11
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 7%
2.5%
12
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Hypertension
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Nutrients
based on 43 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
16
Heart Rhythm
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 9%
1.3%
18
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
19
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 44%
1.3%
20
Heart
based on 10 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Circulation
based on 37 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
based on 10 papers
Top 1.0%
0.8%
23
Atherosclerosis
based on 16 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Current Developments in Nutrition
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Biomedicines
based on 21 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Medicine
based on 29 papers
Top 9%
0.7%
27
Circulation: Heart Failure
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
28
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 8%
0.7%