Predictors for the Recurrence and Prognosis of Stroke patients within a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population
Lee, K. S.; Siow, I.; Riandini, T.; Narasimhalu, K.; Tan, K. B.; De Silva, D. A.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThere is a paucity of studies investigating the risk profile, and outcomes amongst young versus old stroke patients in Asian populations. Singapore is uniquely placed to contribute to the understanding of these risk factors, given our multi-ethnic population. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify predictors of recurrence and outcome in stroke, comparing the young and the older stroke patients in Singapore. MethodsThis cohort study adhered to STROBE guidelines. Data were obtained from the Singapore Stroke Registry (SSR) from 2005 to 2016, to compare outcomes after first stroke among young (18-49 years) and among old stroke ([≥]50 years) patients. Outcome measures included recurrent stroke, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and death from the above. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to determine risk factors for time to each outcome after first stroke, which included demographic and comorbidity variables. ResultsA total of 64,915 patients (6,705 young, and 58,210 old) were included in our analysis. After adjusting for gender, ethnicity, and comorbidities, old stroke patients have a greater hazard for recurrent stroke (HR = 1.20, 95%CI: 1.11-1.29), AMI (HR = 1.72, 95%CI: 1.52-1.94), and for recurrent stroke/AMI (HR = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.27-1.45). The old stroke patients were also more likely to die than younger stroke patients (HR = 2.62, 95%CI: 2.48-2.78). Amongst young stroke patients, males were at greater hazards for recurrent stroke (HR = 1.18, 95%CI: 1.00-1.38), AMI (HR = 1.40, 95%CI: 1.07-1.82), recurrent stroke/AMI (HR = 1.17, 95%CI: 1.02-1.36). However, males were at reduced hazards for death (HR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.77-0.98). When analysing specifically young stroke patients, compared with the Chinese ethnicity, the Malay ethnicity was predisposed to recurrent stroke (HR = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.14-1.64). Compared with the Chinese ethnicity, both the Malay and Indian ethnicities were predisposed to AMI. The Malay ethnicity was at greater hazards for death (HR = 1.45, 95%CI: 1.27-1.66). ConclusionsNon-Chinese ethnicities, especially Malay and Indian ethnicities experience poorer outcomes after first stroke. Further optimisation of risk factors targeting these high-priority populations are needed to achieve high quality care.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study 96%
- Predictors of survival in patients with ischemic stroke and active cancer: A prospective, multicenter, observational study 95%
- COVID-19 Infection Is Associated with Poor Outcomes in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vascular Risk Factor Prevalence and Trends in Native Americans With Ischemic Stroke - A National Inpatient Sample Analysis 96%
- White matter lesions as a prognostic marker of recurrence in cryptogenic stroke with high-risk patent foramen ovale 96%
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Short-term Functional Outcomes of Patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage in the Native and Expatriate Population 97%
- Endovascular thrombectomy: an effective and safe therapy for perioperative ischemic stroke 94%
- Left Hemisphere Bias of NIH Stroke Scale is Most Severe for Middle Cerebral Artery Strokes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improvement in Delivery of Ischemic Stroke Treatments but Stagnation of Clinical Outcomes in Young Adults in South Korea 95%
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 95%
- Normobaric Hyperoxia Combined with Endovascular Treatment Based on Temporal Gradient: A dose-escalation study 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.