Characterization of an EG.5.1 clinical isolate in vitro and in vivo
Uraki, R.; Kiso, M.; Iwatsuki-Horimoto, K.; Yamayoshi, S.; Ito, M.; Chiba, S.; Sakai-Tagawa, Y.; Imai, M.; Kashima, Y.; Koga, M.; Fuwa, N.; Okumura, N.; Hojo, M.; Iwamoto, N.; Kato, H.; Nakajima, H.; Ohmagari, N.; Yotsuyanagi, H.; Suzuki, Y.; Kawaoka, Y.
10.1101/2023.08.31.555819 bioRxivShow abstract
EG.5.1 is a subvariant of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB variant that is rapidly increasing in prevalence worldwide. EG.5.1 has additional substitutions in its spike protein (namely, Q52H and F456L) compared with XBB.1.5. However, the pathogenicity, transmissibility, and immune evasion properties of clinical isolates of EG.5.1 are largely unknown. In this study, we used wild-type Syrian hamsters to investigate the replicative ability, pathogenicity, and transmissibility of a clinical EG.5.1 isolate. Our data show that there are no obvious differences in growth ability and pathogenicity between EG.5.1 and XBB.1.5, and both EG.5.1 and XBB.1.5 are attenuated compared to a Delta variant isolate. We also found that EG.5.1 is transmitted more efficiently between hamsters compared with XBB.1.5. In addition, unlike XBB.1.5, we detected EG.5.1 virus in the lungs of four of six exposed hamsters, suggesting that the virus tropism of EG.5.1 is different from that of XBB.1.5 after airborne transmission. Finally, we assessed the neutralizing ability of plasma from convalescent individuals and found that the neutralizing activity against EG.5.1 was slightly, but significantly, lower than that against XBB.1.5 or XBB.1.9.2. This suggests that EG.5.1 effectively evades humoral immunity and that the amino acid differences in the S protein of EG.5.1 compared with that of XBB.1.5 or XBB.1.9.2 (i.e., Q52H, R158G, and F456L) alter the antigenicity of EG.5.1. Our data suggest that the increased transmissibility and altered antigenicity of EG.5.1 may be driving its increasing prevalence over XBB.1.5 in the human population.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-neutralization and viral fitness of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sublineages 97%
- Replication Kinetics, Pathogenicity and Virus-induced Cellular Responses of Cattle-origin Influenza A(H5N1) Isolates from Texas, United States 96%
- Pigs are highly susceptible to but do not transmit mink-derived highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The SARS-CoV-2 Spike is a virulence determinant and plays a major role on the attenuated phenotype of Omicron virus in a feline model of infection 96%
- Differential antigenic imprinting effects between influenza H1N1 hemagglutinin and neuraminidase in a mouse model 96%
- Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Adaptation to Available Cellular Proteases 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- TMPRSS2 is essential for SARS-CoV-2 Beta and Omicron infection 96%
- Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 VOC neutralization and novel mAb reveal protection against Omicron 96%
- A novel rotavirus reverse genetics platform supports flexible insertion of exogenous genes and enables rapid development of a high-throughput neutralization assay 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 ORF8 modulates lung inflammation and clinical disease progression 96%
- Live-attenuated pediatric parainfluenza vaccine expressing 6P-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is protective against SARS-CoV-2 variants in hamsters 96%
- The B.1.427/1.429 (epsilon) SARS-CoV-2 variants are more virulent than ancestral B.1 (614G) in Syrian hamsters 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ronapreve (REGN-CoV; casirivimab and imdevimab) reduces the viral burden and alters the pulmonary response to the SARS-CoV 2 Delta variant (B.1.617.2) in K18-hACE2 mice using an experimental design reflective of a treatment use case 95%
- Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus infections in wild red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) show neurotropism and adaptive virus mutations 95%
- Bioluminescent reporter influenza A viruses to track viral infections 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.