Back

Application of MALDI-MS and Machine Learning to Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and non-SARS-CoV-2 Respiratory Infections.

Yegorov, S.; Kadyrova, I.; Korshukov, I.; Sultanbekova, A.; Barkhanskaya, V.; Bashirova, T.; Zhunusov, Y.; Li, Y.; Parakhina, V.; Kolesnichenko, S.; Baiken, Y.; Matkarimov, B.; Vazenmiller, D.; Miller, M. S.; Hortelano, G. H.; Turmuhambetova, A.; Chesca, A. E.; Babenko, D.

2023-09-02 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.08.31.23294891 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMatrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) could aid the diagnosis of acute respiratory infections (ARI) owing to its affordability and high-throughput capacity. MALDI-MS has been proposed for use on commonly available respiratory samples, without specialized sample preparation, making this technology especially attractive for implementation in low-resource regions. Here, we assessed the utility of MALDI-MS in differentiating SARS-CoV-2 versus non-COVID acute respiratory infections (NCARI) in a clinical lab setting of Kazakhstan. MethodsNasopharyngeal swabs were collected from in- and outpatients with respiratory symptoms and from asymptomatic controls (AC) in 2020-2022. PCR was used to differentiate SARS-CoV-2+ and NCARI cases. MALDI-MS spectra were obtained for a total of 252 samples (115 SARS-CoV-2+, 98 NCARI and 39 AC) without specialized sample preparation. In our first sub-analysis, we followed a published protocol for peak preprocessing and Machine Learning (ML), trained on publicly available spectra from South American SARS-CoV-2+ and NCARI samples. In our second sub-analysis, we trained ML models on a peak intensity matrix representative of both South American (SA) and Kazakhstan (Kaz) samples. ResultsApplying the established MALDI-MS pipeline "as is" resulted in a high detection rate for SARS-CoV-2+ samples (91.0%), but low accuracy for NCARI (48.0%) and AC (67.0%) by the top-performing random forest model. After re-training of the ML algorithms on the SA-Kaz peak intensity matrix, the accuracy of detection by the top-performing Support Vector Machine with radial basis function kernel model was at 88.0, 95.0 and 78% for the Kazakhstan SARS-CoV-2+, NCARI, and AC subjects, respectively with a SARS-CoV-2 vs. rest ROC AUC of 0.983 [0.958, 0.987]; a high differentiation accuracy was maintained for the South American SARS-CoV-2 and NCARI. ConclusionsMALDI-MS/ML is a feasible approach for the differentiation of ARI without a specialized sample preparation. The implementation of MALDI-MS/ML in a real clinical lab setting will necessitate continuous optimization to keep up with the rapidly evolving landscape of ARI.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Proteomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
3
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.5%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.7%
5
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.4%
7
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
8
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.9%
10
PROTEOMICS
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
12
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.4%
15
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.0%
17
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
18
Journal of Clinical Virology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
21
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
24
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%