Back

Fractional dosing to improve vaccination coverage, vaccine hesitancy, and cost-effectiveness in Africa: a systematic review

Yacouba, A.; Brah, S.; Daou, M.; Andia, A. K.; Ibrahim, A.; Mahaman Moustapha, L.; Alhousseini, D.; Doutchi, M.; Guindo, O.; Soumana, I.; Coldiron, M. E.; Mamadou, S.; Adehossi, E.; Grais, R.

2023-08-29 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.08.28.23294558 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe major challenges of vaccination programs are notably coverage in the target population, vaccine hesitancy, and cost-effectiveness. A vaccination strategy with fractional doses is a dose-saving strategy to address current vaccine shortages. Herein, we aimed to review the literature on administering fractional vaccine doses in Africa. MethodsA methodical search of PubMed was conducted to identify articles published up till March 31, 2023. Peer-reviewed studies were selected for inclusion if they focused on studies that described the use of fractional doses of vaccines and were conducted in any of the 54 African countries. ResultsFindings from eleven eligible studies were analyzed. Studies were from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda. They covered five vaccines including the yellow fever vaccine (n=3; 27.3%), inactivated poliovirus vaccine (n=3; 27.3%), meningococcal A/C/Y/W135 vaccine (n=2; 18.2%), Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (n=2; 18.2%), and malaria vaccine (n=1; 9.1%). Fractionated doses used most often consist of one-fifth of the standard dose (n=8; 72.7%). Regarding immunogenicity/efficacity, eight of ten studies that addressed immunogenicity suggest that immune responses to the fractional dose vaccines were comparable to that of the standard dose vaccines and resulted in higher antibody titers. Regarding safety, all of the eight studies that addressed the safety of fractional doses in Africa, suggest that safety and tolerability data of fractional dosing were favorable compared to full dose regimen. ConclusionFractional dosing may be considered to address the availability and acceptability of certain vaccines while maintaining protection. This strategy also has the potential advantage of reducing the cost of vaccination programs, vaccine antigen overload, and vaccine side effects.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.4%
2
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
3
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
8
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
9
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.3%
10
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
12
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.7%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
16
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Journal of Travel Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
20
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
23
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
27
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%