Fractional dosing to improve vaccination coverage, vaccine hesitancy, and cost-effectiveness in Africa: a systematic review
Yacouba, A.; Brah, S.; Daou, M.; Andia, A. K.; Ibrahim, A.; Mahaman Moustapha, L.; Alhousseini, D.; Doutchi, M.; Guindo, O.; Soumana, I.; Coldiron, M. E.; Mamadou, S.; Adehossi, E.; Grais, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe major challenges of vaccination programs are notably coverage in the target population, vaccine hesitancy, and cost-effectiveness. A vaccination strategy with fractional doses is a dose-saving strategy to address current vaccine shortages. Herein, we aimed to review the literature on administering fractional vaccine doses in Africa. MethodsA methodical search of PubMed was conducted to identify articles published up till March 31, 2023. Peer-reviewed studies were selected for inclusion if they focused on studies that described the use of fractional doses of vaccines and were conducted in any of the 54 African countries. ResultsFindings from eleven eligible studies were analyzed. Studies were from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda. They covered five vaccines including the yellow fever vaccine (n=3; 27.3%), inactivated poliovirus vaccine (n=3; 27.3%), meningococcal A/C/Y/W135 vaccine (n=2; 18.2%), Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (n=2; 18.2%), and malaria vaccine (n=1; 9.1%). Fractionated doses used most often consist of one-fifth of the standard dose (n=8; 72.7%). Regarding immunogenicity/efficacity, eight of ten studies that addressed immunogenicity suggest that immune responses to the fractional dose vaccines were comparable to that of the standard dose vaccines and resulted in higher antibody titers. Regarding safety, all of the eight studies that addressed the safety of fractional doses in Africa, suggest that safety and tolerability data of fractional dosing were favorable compared to full dose regimen. ConclusionFractional dosing may be considered to address the availability and acceptability of certain vaccines while maintaining protection. This strategy also has the potential advantage of reducing the cost of vaccination programs, vaccine antigen overload, and vaccine side effects.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity after booster dose with AZD1222 via intradermal route among adult who had received CoronaVac 95%
- A randomized clinical trial of a booster dose with low versus standard dose of AZD1222 in adult after 2 doses of inactivated vaccines 94%
- A randomized, double-blind phase I clinical trial of two recombinant dimeric RBD COVID-19 vaccine candidates: safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review on Malaria and Tuberculosis (TB) Vaccine Challenges in Sub-Saharan African Clinical Trials 96%
- Immunogenicity and safety of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine compared with Trivalent Influenza HA vaccine and evaluation of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine batch-to-batch consistency in Indonesian children and adults 95%
- Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies in vaccinated and vaccine naïve adult Nigerians 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Human leishmaniasis vaccines: use cases, target population and potential global demand 94%
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and typhoid conjugate vaccine introduction on typhoid fever in Nepal 93%
- Fixed-Dose Ivermectin for Mass Drug Administration: Is it time to leave the dose pole behind? Insights from an Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.