Back

Evaluating the role of amino acids in type 2 diabetes risk: a Mendelian randomization study

Mo, J.; He, B.; Wong, T.; Liang, Y.; Luo, S.; Lo, K.; Louie, J.; Au Yeung, S. L.

2023-08-28 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.08.27.23294702
Show abstract

BackgroundPrevious observational and Mendelian randomization studies suggested different amino acids associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, these studies may suffer from confounding or the use of invalid instruments, respectively. MethodsWe extracted strong (p < 5x10-8), independent (r2 < 0.001) genetic variants associated with nine amino acids (alanine, glutamine, glycine, histidine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, isoleucine, leucine, and valine) from summary statistics of UK Biobank (N [&le;] 115,075), with exclusion of potentially pleiotropic variants. We then applied them to T2D summary statistics from DIAMANTE Consortium (without UK Biobank participants) (N = 455,313) and FinnGen study (N = 365,950), and glycemic traits (MAGIC consortium, N [&le;] 209,605). Inverse variance weighed (IVW) method was the main analysis, with multiple sensitivity analyses to assess robustness of findings. ResultsAlanine was associated with higher T2D risk, correcting for multiple testing (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.50 per SD; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.95). At nominal significance, isoleucine was associated with higher T2D risk (OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.27) and tyrosine was associated with lower T2D risk (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.99). Alanine was also associated with lower insulin, higher glycated hemoglobin and glucose whereas isoleucine and leucine were associated with lower insulin. These associations were consistent in most sensitivity analyses. ConclusionAlaine likely contributed to higher T2D risk whilst the associations for isoleucine and tyrosine requires further verification. Whether these findings explain health effects of sources of amino acids, such as diet, should be further explored.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diabetologia
based on 23 papers
Top 0.2%
12.7%
2
Diabetes Care
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 0.9%
6.4%
4
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 2%
5.3%
5
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 2%
4.5%
6
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
based on 14 papers
Top 0.9%
3.0%
7
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 55%
2.8%
8
Nutrients
based on 43 papers
Top 2%
2.3%
9
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 85%
2.3%
10
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 2%
2.3%
50% of probability mass above
11
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 37%
2.3%
12
Diabetes
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 29%
1.8%
14
eClinicalMedicine
based on 55 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
16
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
17
PLOS Genetics
based on 39 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
18
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 22%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Endocrinology
based on 20 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
20
American Journal of Epidemiology
based on 54 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
21
European Journal of Epidemiology
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
23
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 18%
0.8%
24
British Journal of General Practice
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Nature Genetics
based on 72 papers
Top 9%
0.7%