Back

Evaluating the role of amino acids in type 2 diabetes risk: a Mendelian randomization study

Mo, J.; He, B.; Wong, T.; Liang, Y.; Luo, S.; Lo, K.; Louie, J.; Au Yeung, S. L.

2023-08-28 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.08.27.23294702 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPrevious observational and Mendelian randomization studies suggested different amino acids associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, these studies may suffer from confounding or the use of invalid instruments, respectively. MethodsWe extracted strong (p < 5x10-8), independent (r2 < 0.001) genetic variants associated with nine amino acids (alanine, glutamine, glycine, histidine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, isoleucine, leucine, and valine) from summary statistics of UK Biobank (N [&le;] 115,075), with exclusion of potentially pleiotropic variants. We then applied them to T2D summary statistics from DIAMANTE Consortium (without UK Biobank participants) (N = 455,313) and FinnGen study (N = 365,950), and glycemic traits (MAGIC consortium, N [&le;] 209,605). Inverse variance weighed (IVW) method was the main analysis, with multiple sensitivity analyses to assess robustness of findings. ResultsAlanine was associated with higher T2D risk, correcting for multiple testing (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.50 per SD; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.95). At nominal significance, isoleucine was associated with higher T2D risk (OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.27) and tyrosine was associated with lower T2D risk (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.99). Alanine was also associated with lower insulin, higher glycated hemoglobin and glucose whereas isoleucine and leucine were associated with lower insulin. These associations were consistent in most sensitivity analyses. ConclusionAlaine likely contributed to higher T2D risk whilst the associations for isoleucine and tyrosine requires further verification. Whether these findings explain health effects of sources of amino acids, such as diet, should be further explored.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.