More efficient use of colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening by low-barrier, low-threshold pretesting
Heisser, T.; Cardoso, R.; Niedermaier, T.; Hoffmeister, M.; Brenner, H.
Show abstract
Background Gateopener colonoscopy-based screening is an innovative concept to better target colonoscopy to those most likely to benefit. It combines invitations to screening colonoscopy with the offer of pretesting with a single gateopener fecal immunochemical test (FIT) which is applied with a lower positivity threshold than in conventional screening. We explored optimized use of this approach for reducing CRC incidence and mortality. Methods and FindingsUsing COSIMO, a validated Markov-based simulation tool, we compared outcomes of gateopener screening to those of conventional FIT- or colonoscopy-based screening strategies. Gateopener screening was modelled using SENTiFIT-FOB Gold (Sentinel Diagnostics) as exemplary gateopener FIT. We assessed various low hemoglobin cut-offs (10,8,6,4, and 3 {micro}g/g feces). We found that gateopener screening at cut-offs of 6, 4 or 3 {micro}g/g outperformed conventional screening colonoscopy in terms of CRC incidence reduction, with 16-25%, 50-57% and 66-72% more prevented cases, respectively, after ten years. All gateopener scenarios significantly increased prevented deaths, at low cut-offs more than doubling the numbers achieved by conventional screening colonoscopy. Compared to biennial FIT, gateopener screening prevented 7-163% more CRC cases, with lower cut-offs associated with higher gains, and prevented approximately equal to significantly higher (12-21%) numbers of CRC deaths. Cut-offs of 10 and 8 {micro}g/g required fewer colonoscopies per prevented case and death. ConclusionsGateopener screening outperforms conventional CRC screening by offering considerably stronger reduction of CRC incidence and mortality rates as well as considerably increased screening effectiveness. The feasibility of the concept should be assessed by a pilot study in real-life practice. Author SummaryO_ST_ABSWhy was this study done?C_ST_ABS{checkmark} Screening colonoscopy is used inefficiently as most individuals have no benefit from this invasive procedure. {checkmark}Efficiency could be enhanced by pre-selecting those most likely to benefit, e.g., by use of a single low-threshold fecal immunochemical test ( gateopener FIT). {checkmark}Such pre-test may lower the barrier against using screening colonoscopy and may better target use of colonoscopy. What Did the Researchers Do and Find?{checkmark} A simulation study comparing application of the gateopener approach to conventional colonoscopy or FIT-based screening approaches demonstrated higher proportions of prevented colorectal cancer cases or deaths and/or a more effective use of colonoscopies as compared to conventional screening. What Do These Findings Mean?{checkmark} Inviting subjects to undergo pre-testing with low-threshold FITs could markedly improve outcomes and efficiency of colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening. Lay summaryThis simulation study demonstrates that introducing a simple, highly sensitive pre-test (e.g., an adjusted modern stool test) to identify individuals most likely to benefit from screening colonoscopy could markedly improve the benefits of colorectal cancer screening.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Colorectal cancer screening based on predicted risk: a pilot randomized controlled trial 95%
- Strong reduction of distal colorectal cancer incidence and mortality but no reduction of proximal colon cancer after screening colonoscopy: prospective cohort study 92%
- Incidence, prevalence, and survival of colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom from 2000-2021: a population-based cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ability of known colorectal cancer susceptibility SNPs to predict colorectal cancer risk: A cohort study within the UK Biobank 93%
- Oral aspirin for preventing colorectal adenoma recurrence: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 92%
- Colorectal cancer in patients with single versus double positive faecal immunochemical test results: A retrospective cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Development, Documentation and Validation of a Multistate Markov Model 95%
- Circulating white blood cell traits and colorectal cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study 91%
- Prediction of Colorectal Cancer Risk Based on Profiling with Common Genetic Variants 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining faecal immunochemical testing with blood test results to identify patients with symptoms at risk of colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort of 16,604 patients tested in primary care 93%
- Analytical and clinical validation of a circulating tumor DNA-based assay for multi-cancer early detection 90%
- Describing the population experiencing COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough following second vaccination in England: A cohort study from OpenSAFELY 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related control measures on cancer diagnosis in Catalonia:A time-series analysis of primary care electronic health records covering about 5 million people. 92%
- Development and validation of an algorithm to estimate the risk of severe complications of COVID-19 to prioritise vaccination 91%
- An economic evaluation of two self-sampling strategies for HPV primary cervical cancer screening compared with clinician-collected sampling 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.