Back

Ready-To-Use Investigational Stem Cells in Patients with recent Acute Myocardial Infarction

Ueng, K.; Tsai, C.; Chuang, Y.; Huang, J.-Y.; Liu, J. T.

2023-08-21 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.08.17.23294118 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDCardiovascular diseases are a major health concern, and stem cell therapy holds promise as a potential treatment. However, obtaining stem cells from patients who are already ill poses challenges, as does limited access to specialized laboratories. We aimed to assess the safety and preliminary effectiveness of a read-to-use investigational stem cell product, MiSaver, in patients with recent acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODSWe enrolled 10 participants with AMI and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF [&le;]45%). Group A (n=5) received a low dosage of 0.5x107 cells/kg, and Group B (n=5) received a high dosage of 1.6x107 cells/kg of cells. Additionally, 20 control patients who received standard care were included for statistical analysis. The primary outcome was the occurrence of side effects or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) associated with the stem cell treatment. Secondary outcomes included changes in LVEF. RESULTSDuring the 12-month follow-up period, no study-related adverse effects or GVHD were observed. Baseline LVEF values for Group A and Group B were 42.0% and 41.3%, respectively, increasing to 53.0% and 53.7% at 12 months. Furthermore, no signs or symptoms of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were reported. Significant improvements in LVEF were observed in non-morbidly obese treated patients (cases 1-9), with baseline values of 41.3% and 12-month values of 53.7%, compared to the control group with baseline and 12-month values of 42.35% and 47.5%, respectively (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONSThis trial demonstrated the safety and tolerability of MiSaver stem cells in patients with recent AMI. Preliminary evidence suggests efficacy in improving outcomes in non-morbidly obese participants.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.