Back

Hypoxia-inducible-factors differentially contribute to clinical disease and the control of viral replication during RSV infection

Morris, D. R.; Qu, Y.; Jones-Hall, Y. L.; Ivanciuc, T.; Liu, T.; Garofalo, R. P.; Casola, A.

2023-08-17 microbiology
10.1101/2023.08.15.553422 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hypoxia-inducible-factors (HIF) are transcription factors that regulate cellular adaptation to hypoxic conditions, enabling cells to survive in low-oxygen environments. Viruses have evolved to activate this pathway to promote successful viral infection, therefore modulation of HIFs could represent a novel antiviral strategy. In previous in vitro studies, we found that respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), a leading cause of respiratory illness, stabilizes HIFs under normoxic conditions, with inhibition of HIF-1 resulting in reduced viral replication. Despite several HIF modulating compounds being tested/approved for use in other non-infectious models, little is known about their efficacy against respiratory viruses using relevant animal models. This study aimed to characterize the disease modulating properties and antiviral potential of HIF-1 (PX478) and HIF-2 (PT2385) inhibitors in RSV-infected BALB/c mice. We found that inhibition of HIF-1 worsen clinical disease parameters, while simultaneously improving lung inflammation and airway function. Additionally, blocking HIF-1 resulted in significantly reduced viral titer at early and peak time points of RSV replication. In contrast, inhibition of HIF-2 was associated with improved clinical parameters, with no changes in airway function, enhanced immune responses and reduced early and peak lung viral replication. Analysis of lung cells found significant modification in the T-cell compartment that correlated with changes in lung pathology and viral titers in response to each HIF inhibitor administration. This study underscores the differential roles of HIF proteins in RSV infection and highlights the need for further characterization of the compounds that are currently in use or under therapeutic consideration.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.