Back

Proteogenomic characterization reveals antitumor mechanisms of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Wang, W.; Xu, S.

2023-08-14 biochemistry
10.1101/2023.08.14.553174 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Diagnosing and managing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) poses a significant oncological hurdle as it is a deadly form of liver cancer.A significant role is played by nonapoptotic regulatory cell death (NRCD) in the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) of iCCA. Nevertheless, the precise functions of NRCD-associated genes (NRGs) in the tumor microenvironment (TME) are still not well understood. Transcriptomics, proteomic analysis, and single-cell RNA analysis were utilized to distinguish two NRG-related clusters in iCCA patients from the FU-iCCA cohort in this study. We have shown the clear disparities in immune traits and predictive categorization among two groups. To address the risk stratification and prognosis prediction, a prognostic signature model called NPS (NRG-related risks core prognostic signature model) was created using the FU-iCCA cohort. The validation of the NRG-associated risk score in prognosis and immunotherapy confirmed its predictive capabilities. In iCCA patients with high-risk, the secretion of CP and TGF-{beta} proteins strengthened the enriched TGF-{beta} signaling network between CD4+ T cells and erythroid cells. Patients exhibiting a low-risk score demonstrated improvement in the effector function of CD4+ T cells, resulting in a more favorable reaction to chemotherapy medications. The NPS-risk score showed a significant negative correlation with the IC50 values of four drugs (Trametinib, CI-1040, X17-ACC, and PD-0325901). From these findings, it can be inferred that a clear connection exists between the NRG and the TME in iCCA. Additionally, the risk score has the potential to act as a reliable prognostic indicator, offering advantageous outcomes for chemotherapy and immunotherapy. This could aid in making informed clinical decisions for patients with iCCA.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.