Back

Application of self-reporting tool clinicians assessment and tacrolimus trough level in evaluating adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients. A cohort study.

Dorji, C.; Tobgay, T.; Na-Bangchang, K.

2023-08-16 nephrology
10.1101/2023.08.14.23294064 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionImmunosuppressants are drugs with narrow therapeutic indices and pharmacokinetic variation. Nonadherence to the therapy will cause over or underexposure leading to graft rejection. MethodsA cohort study was conducted on kidney transplant recipients from the nephrology clinic and therapeutic drug monitoring unit. Patients were asked to self-report their medication adherence using a self-assessment tool. Assessment by clinicians and variation of tacrolimus levels were evaluated. Tacrolimus concentration and kidney function were measured prospectively to correlate with patients adherence. The variation of tacrolimus levels between 20-43 % was classified as medium and above 43 % as poor adherence. ResultsAmong 58 participants, 33 (56.7%) were females. The maximum number of years attained after transplantation was 17, with a median duration of 5 years. On the self-reporting scale, 47.0% of adherence was due to fear of graft rejection. Among nonadherences, 77.4% had their immunosuppressive therapy two hours before or after the prescribed time. Based on the clinician score, 39 (67.2%) and 42 (72.4%) cases were identified as nonadherence and having tacrolimus C trough level above 20 % respectively. The median (95% CI) serum creatine and blood urea nitrogen levels in the medium category were 1.23 mg/dL (1.2-1.4) (P = 0.009) and 28.3 mg/dL (26.4-36.4) (P = 0.021) respectively. The corresponding values for poor adherence were 2.5 mg/dL (1.6-3.5) (P = 0.03) and 43.0 mg/dL (35.5-78.0) (P = 0.01). ConclusionsThe fear of allograft rejection is linked to a better adherence rate. Nonadherent transplant recipients required close observation and frequent monitoring of immunosuppressant levels for graft survival.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.