Association of coffee consumption in metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional and Mendelian randomization study in UK Biobank
Wong, H. T.; Luo, S.; Au Yeung, S. L.; Louie, J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate the associations between coffee consumption and metabolic syndrome and its component conditions, as well as the effect of using milk, sugar, and artificial sweetener on these associations. Research Design and MethodsThe cross-sectional analysis included 351,805 participants from the UK Biobank. Coffee consumption data was obtained using food frequency questionnaire and 24-hour recall and metabolic syndrome was ascertained based on blood biochemistry results and self-reported medication use. Odds ratios were calculated using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for lifestyle and socioeconomic factors, with verification using two-sample Mendelian randomization. ResultsCoffee consumption up to 2 cups per day was inversely associated with metabolic syndrome (1 cup/day, OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.85, 0.92; 2 cups/day, OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.93) while associations at higher intakes were near null. Mendelian randomization did not support a causal association between coffee intake and metabolic syndrome. Both self-reported and genetically predicted high coffee consumption (4 cups per day or more) were associated with central obesity. The inverse association between coffee consumption and metabolic syndrome was more profound among drinkers of ground coffee than those of instant coffee. Results were similar when stratified by the use of milk and sugar, yet the use of artificial sweetener with coffee was positively associated with metabolic syndrome and all component conditions. ConclusionsCoffee consumption likely increase the risk of central obesity but unlikely impact risk of metabolic syndrome. The possible health effect of using artificial sweetener with coffee warrant investigations in future studies.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A healthy childhood environment helps to combat inherited susceptibility to obesity 92%
- Maternal obesity before pregnancy predicts offspring blood pressure at 18 years of age: A causal mediation analysis 91%
- Effects of adiposity on the human plasma proteome: Observational and Mendelian randomization estimates 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Waist circumference thresholds predicting incident dysglycemia and type 2 diabetes in Black African men and women 93%
- Proteomic associations with fluctuation and long-term changes in BMI: A 40-year follow-up study 93%
- Comparative Effects of Weight Loss and Incretin-Based Therapies on Endothelial Vasodilatory and Fibrinolytic Function 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationships between body fat distribution and metabolic syndrome traits and outcomes: a Mendelian Randomization study 94%
- Baseline Cardiometabolic Profiles and SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the UK Biobank 93%
- Prevalence of uncoupling protein one genetic polymorphisms and their relationship with cardiovascular and metabolic health 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- MRI assessment of adipose tissue fatty acid composition in the UK Biobank and its association with diet and disease 93%
- Interscapular fat is associated with impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance independent of visceral fat mass 92%
- The Pediatric Obesity Microbiome and Metabolism Study (POMMS): Methods, Baseline Data, and Early Insights. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Methods and participant characteristics in the Cancer Risk in Vegetarians Consortium: A cross-sectional analysis across 11 prospective studies 93%
- Educational Inequality in Multimorbidity: Causality and Causal Pathways. A Mendelian Randomisation Study in UK Biobank 92%
- Life-course social disparities in body mass index trajectories across adulthood: cohort study evidence from China Health and Nutrition Survey 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.