A deep learning approach for cancer diagnosis exclusively from raw sequencing fragments of bisulfite-treated plasma cell-free DNA
Liu, J.; Shen, H.; Hu, J.; Shen, X.; Zhang, C.; Yang, Y.; Yang, M.; Wang, W.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, J.; Chen, K.; Li, X.
Show abstract
Early cancer diagnosis from bisulfite-treated cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragments require tedious data analytical procedures. Here, we present a Deep-learning-based approach for Early Cancer Interception and DIAgnosis (DECIDIA) that can achieve accurate cancer diagnosis exclusively from bisulfite-treated cfDNA sequencing fragments. DECIDIA relies on feature representation learning of DNA fragments and weakly supervised learning for classification. We systematically evaluate the performance of DECIDIA for cancer diagnosis and cancer-type prediction on a curated dataset of 5389 samples that consist of colorectal cancer (CRC, n = 1574), hepatocellular cell carcinoma (HCC, n = 1181), lung cancer (n = 654) and non-cancer control (n=1980). DECIDIA achieves an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.980 (95% CI, 0.976-0.984) in ten-fold cross validation settings on the CRC dataset, outperforming benchmarked methods that are based on fragmentation profiles and methylation intensities. Noticeably, DECIDIA achieves an AUROC of 0.910 (95% CI, 0.896-0.924) on the externally independent HCC testing set although there was no HCC data used in model development. In the settings of cancer-type classification, we observed that DECIDIA achieves a micro-average AUROC of 0.963 (95% CI, 0.960-0.966) and an overall accuracy of 82.8% (95%CI, 81.8% - 83.9%). In addition, we distilled four sequence signatures from the raw sequencing reads that exhibited differential patterns in cancer versus control and among different cancer types. Our approach represents a new paradigm towards eliminating the tedious data analytical procedures for liquid biopsy that uses bisulfite-treated cfDNA methylome.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- DISMIR: a deep learning-based cancer-detection method by integrating DNA sequence and methylation information of individual cell-free DNA reads 96%
- LiBis: An ultrasensitive alignment method for low-input bisulfite sequencing 95%
- scDeepInsight: a supervised cell-type identification method for scRNA-seq data with deep learning 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Directly selecting differentially expressed genes for single-cell clustering analyses 93%
- SELINA: Single-cell Assignment using Multiple-Adversarial Domain Adaptation Network with Large-scale References 93%
- Systematic integration of protein affecting mutations, gene fusions, and copy number alterations into a comprehensive somatic mutational profile 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting Endometrial Cancer Subtypes and Molecular Features from Histopathology Images Using Multi-resolution Deep Learning Models 95%
- Predicting Gene Spatial Expression and Cancer Prognosis: An Integrated Graph and Image Deep Learning Approach Based on HE Slides 93%
- Deep Learning identifies new morphological patterns of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in luminal breast cancers from whole slide images. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- ASURAT: functional annotation-driven unsupervised clustering of single-cell transcriptomes 95%
- Deep5hmC: Predicting genome-wide 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine landscape via a multimodal deep learning model 95%
- ECMarker: Interpretable machine learning model identifies gene expression biomarkers predicting clinical outcomes and reveals molecular mechanisms of human disease in early stages 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.