Forced-rate aerobic cycling enhances motor recovery in persons with chronic stroke: A randomized clinical trial
Linder, S.; Bischof-Bockbrader, A.; Davidson, S.; Li, Y.; Lapin, B.; Singh, T. K.; Lee, J.; Bethoux, F.; Alberts, J. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe potential for intensive aerobic exercise to enhance neuroplasticity post-stroke has been theorized but not systematically investigated. Our aim was to determine the effects of forced-rate aerobic exercise paired with an abbreviated session of upper extremity (UE) repetitive task practice (FE+RTP) compared to time-matched UE repetitive task practice (RTP only) on the recovery of motor function in individuals with chronic stroke. MethodsA single center randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 2019 to December 2022. Sixty individuals [≥]6 months following single stroke with residual UE hemiparesis aged 18-85 were recruited. Participants were randomized 1:1 to one of two time-matched groups: FE+RTP (N=30) or RTP only (N=30). Both groups completed 90-minute sessions, 3x/week for 8 weeks. The FE+RTP group underwent 45-minutes of forced-rate aerobic exercise (FE) followed by 45-min of UE RTP. The RTP only group completed 2 sequential 45-minute sessions of UE RTP. The primary UE outcomes were the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). The Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT) assessed walking capacity. ResultsSixty individuals 60.5 ({+/-}10.6) years of age and 26.0 [13.0, 69.0] months post-stroke were enrolled, and 56 completed the study. The RTP only group completed more RTP in terms of repetitions (411.8{+/-}44.4 versus 222.8{+/-}28.4, P<0.001) and time (72.7{+/-}6.7 versus 37.8{+/-}2.4 minutes, P<0.001) compared to FE+RTP. Both groups improved on the FMA (FE+RTP, 36.2{+/-}10.1 to 44.0{+/-}11.8 and RTP only, 34.4{+/-}11.0 to 41.2{+/-}13.4, P<0.001) and ARAT (FE+RTP, 32.5{+/-}16.6 to 37.7{+/-}17.9 and RTP only, 32.8{+/-}18.6 to 36.4{+/-}18.5, P<0.001). A group main effect was not observed. The FE+RTP group demonstrated greater improvements on the 6MWT (274.9{+/-}122.0 to 327.1{+/-}141.2 meters) compared to the RTP only group (285.5{+/-}160.3 to 316.9{+/-}170.0, P=0.004). ConclusionsWhile both interventions elicited comparable improvements in UE motor recovery, the summative value of FE+RTP in improving UE and lower extremity function was demonstrated. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03819764
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Heavy Resistance Exercise Training in Older Men: A Responder and Inter-individual Variability Analysis 96%
- Investigating the optimal reactive balance training intensity in people with chronic stroke: study protocol for a randomized control trial 95%
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying Exercise Intensity to Predict Changes in Walking Capacity in People with Chronic Stroke 98%
- Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: A non-randomized controlled trial 95%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Delphi Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cerebrovascular Response to an Acute Bout of Short Interval High Intensity Interval Exercise and Recovery in Healthy Adults 94%
- Lower Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation following Acute Bout of Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Exercise in Chronic Stroke Compared to Healthy Adults 94%
- T-cell responses to acute cardiorespiratory or resistance exercise in cohorts of physically active or physically inactive older adults: A randomized complete crossover 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 97%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study 94%
- Efficacy of a multiple-component and multifactorial personalized fall prevention program in community-dwelling older adults at moderate-to-high fall risk: The PRE.C.I.S.A. Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.