Novel automaticity index reveals a cognitive ability-related decline in gait automaticity during dual-task walking.
Liu, S.; Rosso, A. L.; Baillargeon, E. M.; Weinstein, A. M.; Rosano, C.; Torres-Oviedo, G.
Show abstract
Gait automaticity refers to the ability to walk with minimal recruitment of attentional networks typically mediated through the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Reduced gait automaticity is common with aging, contributing to an increased risk of falls and reduced quality of life. A common assessment of gait automaticity involves examining PFC activation using near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during dual-task (DT) paradigms, such as walking while performing a cognitive task. However, neither PFC activity nor task performance in isolation measures automaticity accurately. For example, greater PFC activation could be interpreted as worse gait automaticity when accompanied by poorer DT performance, but when accompanied by better DT performance, it could be seen as successful compensation. Thus, there is a need to incorporate behavioral performance and PFC measurements for a more comprehensive evaluation of gait automaticity. To address this need, we propose a novel automaticity index as an analytical approach that combines changes in PFC activity with changes in DT performance to quantify gait automaticity. We validated the index in 173 participants ([≥]65 y/o) who completed DTs with two levels of difficulty while PFC activation was recorded with fNIRS. The two DTs consisted of reciting every other letter of the alphabet while walking over either an even or uneven surface. We found that as DT difficulty increases, more participants showed the anticipated decrease in automaticity as measured by the novel index compared to PFC activation. Furthermore, when comparing across individuals, lower cognitive function related to worse automaticity index, but not PFC activation or DT performance. In sum, the proposed index better quantified the differences in automaticity between tasks and individuals by providing a unified measure of gait automaticity that includes both brain activation and performance. This new approach opens exciting possibilities to assess participant-specific deficits and compare rehabilitation outcomes from gait automaticity interventions.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Lower cognitive set shifting ability is associated with stiffer balance recovery behavior and larger perturbation-evoked cortical responses in older adults 95%
- Differential relationships between brain structure and dual task walking in young and older adults 95%
- The relationship between response dynamics and the formation of confidence varies across the lifespan 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Adults up to 80 years old maintain effective movement planning when facing complex body dynamics 95%
- The Stop Signal Stepping Task: how action cancellation commands disrupt step initiation in young and healthy older adults 95%
- Age-related changes in proprioception are of limited size, outcome-dependent and task-dependent. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Uneven terrain versus dual-task walking: differential challenges imposed on walking behavior in older adults are predicted by cognitive and sensorimotor function 96%
- Adaptation of reach action to a novel force-field is not predicted by acuity of dynamic proprioception in either older or younger adults 93%
- Effects of arm weight support on neuromuscular activation during reaching in chronic stroke patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Motor and cognitive deficits limit the ability to flexibly modulate spatiotemporal gait features in older adults with mild cognitive impairment 96%
- Altered neural recruitment despite dual task performance recovery in athletes with repeat concussion 95%
- Differential brain activity in visuo-perceptual regions during landmark-based navigation in young and healthy older adults 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.