Back

The changes in blood flow velocity in the internal jugular vein under conditions of variable intrapulmonic pressure and gravitational effect

Kasatkin, A.; Kuvshinov, I.; Urakov, A.; Zhulkov, N.

2023-08-01 pathology
10.1101/2023.07.28.551064 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWe explored the dynamics of changes in the blood flow velocity in the internal jugular vein (IJV) under conditions of changing intrapulmonary pressure and gravitational influence in healthy volunteers. MethodsColor duplex ultrasonography of the right IJV was performed in 25 healthy volunteers of both genders. The dopplergram of the blood flow spectrum was recorded in the right IJV in the horizontal supine position of the participants, and 3 minutes after the volunteers had attained the new position due to the lifting the bed back section at the 30{degrees}. We recorded the maximum (Max) and minimum (Min) linear of blood flow velocity (cm/s). In each position, the measurements were carried out sequentially at positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) values of 0, 5, 10 cmH2O after 3 minutes by process of changing the level of PEEP. Quantitative data were presented as arithmetic mean (M), standard deviation (SD) and compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. ResultsOur data demonstrated that negatively related influence of continuous positive airway pressure on IJV blood flow velocity: Max/Min 57.40{+/-}13.10/20.68{+/-}7.80 cm/s (PEEP 0 cmH2O), 39.00{+/-}18.80/14.63{+/-}4.90 (PEEP 5 cmH2O), 30.83{+/-}7.30/13.25{+/-}2.90 (PEEP 10 cmH2O). The blood flow velocity values are increased after 30{degrees} head elevation in PEEP 5 and 10 cmH2O in comparison to 0{degrees} values. ConclusionsThe constant positive airway pressure 5-10 cmH2O in a person in supine position decreasing blood flow velocity in IJV. The 30{degrees} head elevation eliminates this effect.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.