Fight or Flight: Emergency Healthcare Workers Willingness to Work during Crises and Disasters: A cross-sectional multicentre study in the Netherlands
Engels, L.; Barten, D.; Boumans, T.; Gaakeer, M.; Latten, G.; Mehagnoul, J.; Tapirdamaz, O.; Mortelmans, L.
Show abstract
ObjectiveExpanding staff levels is a strategy for hospitals to increase surge capacity. This study aimed to evaluate whether emergency healthcare workers (HCWs) are willing to work (WTW) during a crises or disaster and which working conditions would influence their decision. MethodsHCWs of emergency departments (ED) and intensive care units (ICU) of five Dutch hospitals were surveyed about elevens disaster scenarios. For each scenario, HCWs were asked about their WTW and which conditions would influence their decision. Knowledge and perceived risk and danger was assessed per scenario. Results306/630 HCWs completed the survey. An influenza epidemic, SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and natural disaster were associated with highest WTW rates (69.0%, 63.7% and 53.3% respectively). WTW was lowest in nuclear incident (4.6%) and dirty bomb (3.3%) scenarios. WTW was higher in physicians than in nurses. Male ED HCWS, single HCWs and childless HCWs were more often WTW. Personal protective equipment (PPE) and safety of HCWs family were the most important working conditions. Perceived knowledge scored lowest in dirty bomb, biological and nuclear incident scenarios. These scenarios rated highest with regards to perceived danger. ConclusionsWTW depended on disaster type, profession and working department. Provision of PPE and safety of HCWs family were found to be predominant working conditions.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The experience of European hospital-based health care workers on following infection prevention and control procedures for COVID-19 96%
- Ethical and psychosocial considerations for hospital personnel in the Covid-19 crisis: Moral injury and resilience 96%
- Risk perceptions and preventive practices of COVID-19 among healthcare professionals in public hospitals in Ethiopia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Occupational challenges of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study 96%
- High risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among frontline healthcare workers in Northeast Brazil: a respondent-driven sampling approach 95%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 94%
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 93%
- The Balancing Act of Academic Clinical Fellows in UK Emergency Medicine: A Qualitative Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare workers preparedness for COVID-19 pandemic in the occupied Palestinian territory: a cross-sectional survey 94%
- Healthcare workers experiences of working on the frontline and views about support during COVID-19 and comparable pandemics: A rapid review and meta-synthesis 93%
- Management of the COVID-19 health crisis: A survey in Swiss hospital pharmacies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 95%
- Healthcare workers’ perceptions and medically approved COVID-19 infection risk: understanding the mental health dimension of the pandemic. A German hospital case study 94%
- SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 lineage-related perceptions, COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and travel worry among healthcare workers 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.