LigaNET: A multi-modal deep learning approach to predict the risk of subsequent anterior cruciate ligament injury after surgery
Singh, M.; Han, M.; Karimi, D.; Kim, J. Y.; Flannery, S. W.; BEAR Trial Team, ; Murray, M. M.; Fleming, B. C.; Gholipour, A.; Kiapour, A. M.
Show abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are a common cause of soft tissue injuries in young active individuals, leading to a significant risk of premature joint degeneration. Postoperative management of such injuries, in particular returning patients to athletic activities, is a challenge with immediate and long-term implications including the risk of subsequent injury. In this study, we present LigaNET, a multi-modal deep learning pipeline that predicts the risk of subsequent ACL injury following surgical treatment. Postoperative MRIs (n=1,762) obtained longitudinally between 3 to 24 months after ACL surgery from a cohort of 159 patients along with 11 non-imaging outcomes were used to train and test: 1) a 3D CNN to predict subsequent ACL injury from segmented ACLs, 2) a 3D CNN to predict injury from the whole MRI, 3) a logistic regression classifier predict injury from non-imaging data, and 4) a multi-modal pipeline by fusing the predictions of each classifier. The CNN using the segmented ACL achieved an accuracy of 77.6% and AUROC of 0.84, which was significantly better than the CNN using the whole knee MRI (accuracy: 66.6%, AUROC: 0.70; P<.001) and the non-imaging classifier (accuracy: 70.1%, AUROC: 0.75; P=.039). The fusion of all three classifiers resulted in highest classification performance (accuracy: 80.6%, AUROC: 0.89), which was significantly better than each individual classifier (P<.001). The developed multi-modal approach had similar performance in predicting the risk of subsequent ACL injury from any of the imaging sequences (P>.10). Our results demonstrate that a deep learning approach can achieve high performance in identifying patients at high risk of subsequent ACL injury after surgery and may be used in clinical decision making to improve postoperative management (e.g., safe return to sports) of ACL injured patients.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MRI-derived Articular Cartilage Strains Predict Patient-Reported Outcomes Six Months Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction 96%
- Multiscale Correlations between Joint and Tissue-Specific Biomechanics and Anatomy in Postmortem Ovine Stifles 94%
- Foot strike pattern during running alters muscle-tendon dynamics of the gastrocnemius and the soleus 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is Modular Control Related To Functional Outcomes In Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis And Following Total Knee Arthroplasty? 93%
- Tissue-specific changes in size and shape of the ligaments and tendons of the porcine knee during post-natal growth 93%
- pyKNEEr: An image analysis workflow for open and reproducible research on femoral knee cartilage 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- HIF1α gates tendon response to overload and drives tendinopathy independently of vascular recruitment 90%
- Increased beta2-adrenergic signaling is a targetable stimulus essential for bone healing by promoting callus neovascularization 89%
- Variants in ALDH1A2 reveal an anti-inflammatory role for retinoic acid and a new class of disease-modifying drugs in osteoarthritis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Concurrent Joint Contact in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury induces cartilage micro-injury and subchondral bone sclerosis, resulting in knee osteoarthritis 94%
- Joint Instability Causes Catabolic Enzyme Production in Chondrocytes prior to Synovial Cells in Novel Non-Invasive ACL ruptured Mouse Model 93%
- Automating three-dimensional osteoarthritis histopathological grading of human osteochondral tissue using machine learning on contrast-enhanced micro-computed tomography 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.