Industry payments to anesthesiologists in the United States between 2014 and 2022
Murayama, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundFinancial relationships between physicians and the healthcare industry could be beneficial to improve patient care, but could lead to conflicts of interest. However, there was no study specifically evaluating the extent of financial relationships between anesthesiologists and the healthcare industry in the United States. MethodsUsing the Open Payments Database between 2014 and 2022, this longitudinal cross-sectional study examined the size, prevalence and trends of general (non-research) payments made by the healthcare industry to all anesthesiologists in the United States. ResultsOver the nine-year period, 67.0% of all anesthesiologists received general payments totaling $272.0 million over nine years, while 21.0% to 35.3% of anesthesiologists received one or more general payments each year. Median annual general payments to anesthesiologists ranged from $57 to $115. The top 1%, 5%, and 10% of anesthesiologists received 73.4%, 90.3%, and 94.8% of all general payments, respectively. There were no constant yearly trends in the total amounts and per-anesthesiologist general payments between 2014 and 2019, but significant declines occurred in 2020, likely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Pain medicine physicians received the highest median general payments of $4,426 in nine-year combined total amounts, followed by addiction medicine ($431), critical care medicine ($277), and general anesthesiology ($256). ConclusionThis study reveals significant financial relationships between the healthcare industry and anesthesiologists, with a disproportionate concentration of payments among a minority of anesthesiologists. While no clear trends in payments were evident before the pandemic, there was a substantial reduction during the COVID-19 outbreak.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between epidural catheter tip malposition and anesthesiologists’ experience after graduation: a cross-sectional study using postoperative CT images 93%
- S-ketamine in patient-controlled analgesia with oxycodone improves analgesia in a dose-dependent manner after major lumbar fusion surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial 93%
- Unplanned Hospital Visits after Ambulatory Surgical Care 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Financial Conflicts of Interest among U.S. Physician Authors of 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Cross-Sectional Study 94%
- Sunshine on KOL : a retrospective study about financial ties between medical key opinion leaders and pharmaceutical industry in France 93%
- Accuracy of Conflict-of-Interest Disclosures of Physician-Authors Publishing in High-Impact U.S. Medical Journals: A Comparison of the Journal of the American Medical Association and the New England Journal of Medicine 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationships of Prescription Opioid Sales to Opiate Treatment Admissions and Overdose Deaths: A Reanalysis of Relationships -- United States 2010-2019 89%
- Three-month outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients 88%
- Autonomic Nervous System Markers of Music-Elicited Analgesia in People with Fibromyalgia: A Double-Blind Randomized Pilot Study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preoperative predictions of in-hospital mortality using electronic medical record data 91%
- Effect of Telemedicine Support for Intraoperative Anaesthesia Care on Postoperative Outcomes: The TECTONICS Randomised Clinical Trial 90%
- Surgical activity in England and Wales during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide observational cohort study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 88%
- Identifying High Priority Ethical Challenges for Precision Emergency Medicine - A Nominal Group Study 88%
- Is virtual care the new normal? Evidence supporting Covid-19’s durable transformation on healthcare delivery 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.