Exploring COVID-19 vaccine uptake among healthcare workers in Zimbabwe: A mixed methods study
Taruvinga, T.; Chingono, R. S.; Marambire, E.; Larsson, L.; Olaru, I. D.; Sibanda, S.; Nzvere, F.; Redzo, N.; Ndhlovu, C. E.; Rusakaniko, S.; Mujuru, H.; Sibanda, E.; Chonzi, P.; Siamuchembu, M.; Chikodzore, R.; Mahomva, A.; Ferrand, R. A.; Dixon, J.; Kranzer, K.
Show abstract
With COVID-19 no longer categorized as a public health emergency of international concern, vaccination strategies and priority groups for vaccination have evolved. Africa Centers for Diseases Prevention and Control proposed the 100-100-70% strategy which aims to vaccinate all healthcare workers, all vulnerable groups, and 70% of the general population. Understanding whether healthcare workers were reached during previous vaccination campaigns and what can be done to address concerns, anxieties, and other influences on vaccine uptake, will be important to optimally plan how to achieve these ambitious targets. In this mixed-methods study, between June 2021 and July 2022 a quantitative survey was conducted with healthcare workers accessing a comprehensive health check in Zimbabwe to determine whether and, if so, when they had received a COVID-19 vaccine. Healthcare workers were categorized as those who had received the vaccine early (before 30.06.2021) and those who had received it late (after 30.06.2021). In addition, 17 in-depth interviews were conducted to understand perceptions and beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines. Of the 2905 healthcare workers employed at 37 facilities who participated in the study, 2818 (97%, 95% CI [92%-102%]) reported that they had received at least one vaccine dose. Geographical location, older age, higher educational attainment and having a chronic condition was associated with receiving the vaccine early. Qualitatively, (mis)information, infection risk perception, quasi-mandatory vaccination requirements, and legitimate concerns such as safety and efficacy influenced vaccine uptake. Meeting the proposed 100-100-70 target entails continued emphasis on strong communication while engaging meaningfully with healthcare workers concerns. Mandatory vaccination may undermine trust and should not be a substitute for sustained engagement.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Vaccine Hesitancy in Care Home Employees in North West England: A Qualitative Study 98%
- “ We don’t routinely check vaccination background in adults” : A national qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to vaccine delivery and uptake in adult migrants through UK primary care 96%
- Adenovirus and RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines: perceptions and acceptance among healthcare workers 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccination beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours among health and social care workers in the UK: a mixed-methods study 98%
- COVID-19 vaccine confidence and hesitancy among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional survey from a MERS-CoV experienced nation 96%
- COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Marginalized Populations in the U.S. and Canada: Protocol for a Scoping Review 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine brand hesitancy and other challenges to vaccination in the Philippines 97%
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 97%
- High confidence and demand for hepatitis E vaccine during an outbreak in Bentiu, South Sudan: A qualitative study 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- “Where the truth really lies”: Listening to voices from African American communities in the Southern States about COVID-19 vaccine information and communication 97%
- Estimating vaccine confidence levels among healthcare staff and students of a tertiary institution in South Africa 96%
- Essential Workers’ COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, Misinformation and Informational Needs in the Republic of North Macedonia 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vaccine Confidence and Hesitancy at the start of COVID-19 vaccine deployment in the UK: An embedded mixed-methods study 96%
- SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: healthcare workers’ perceptions and beliefs of vaccine effectiveness and advocacy: a national survey during the first week of the World Health Organization variant alert 96%
- Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Engagement in Algeria: A Population-based Study with Systematic Review of Studies from Arab Countries of the MENA Region 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.