Back

Digital Nursing Quality Management: A Concept Analysis

Han, L.; Bai, X.; Zhang, H.; An, N.

2023-07-17 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2023.07.16.23292725 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe rapid advancements in digital technology and its increasing integration into healthcare create an opportunity to leverage these innovations for enhancing nursing quality management. ObjectiveThis paper aims to report the results of a concept analysis of digital nursing quality management. MethodsRodgers Evolutionary Method of concept analysis was used to examine the attributes, antecedents, consequences, and related concepts of digital nursing quality management. ResultsDigital Nursing Quality Management is a strategic management approach that systematically utilizes evolving digital technology to pursue optimal nursing quality, guided by the timeless principle of humanistic care. The defining attributes are human-machine collaborativeness, interactive empowerment, and digital ecosystem. ConclusionsDigital nursing quality management is not a mere amalgamation of separate components but a dynamic ecosystem shaped by individual, organizational, and technological factors.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.2%
Similar papers in this journal
2
PLOS Digital Health
● 106 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.0%
Similar papers in this journal
3
JMIRx Med
◐ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Frontiers in Digital Health
○ 24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
Similar papers in this journal
5
JMIR Formative Research
◐ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Frontiers in Public Health
○ 148 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
◐ 87 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.3%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
BMJ Open
● 601 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.9%
10
DIGITAL HEALTH
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
BMJ Open Quality
● 17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
Medicine
○ 31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
13
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
◐ 16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
14
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
○ 98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Age and Ageing
◐ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
npj Digital Medicine
○ 118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
19
JAMIA Open
◐ 42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
BMC Health Services Research
○ 51 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.0%
22
Sensors
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Physiological Measurement
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Medical Decision Making
○ 12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Health Policy
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
27
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
28
Biometrics
◐ 23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
Health Expectations
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
30
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
● 15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.