Maternal Under-Nutrition During Pregnancy Alters the Molecular Response to Over-Nutrition in Multiple Organs and Tissues in Juvenile Offspring
Cox, L. A.; Puppala, S.; Chan, J.; Riojas, A. M.; Lange, K. J.; Birnbaum, S.; Dick, E. J.; Comuzzie, A. G.; Nijland, M. J.; Li, C.; Nathanielsz, P. W.; Olivier, M. M.
Show abstract
Previous studies suggest that mismatch between fetal and postnatal nutrition predisposes individuals to metabolic diseases. We examined whether NHP juvenile offspring of pregnancies with maternal undernutrition (MUN) had altered response to a high-fat, high-carbohydrate diet plus sugar drink challenge (HFCS) compared with controls (CON). Pregnant baboons were fed ad libitum (CON) or 30% calorie reduction from 0.16 gestation through lactation, and weaned offspring fed chow diet ad libitum. Offspring of MUN were growth restricted at birth. At [~]4.5y offspring received a 7-week HFCS challenge. Baseline and HFCS gene expression in liver, omental fat, and skeletal muscle, liver glycogen content, and fat cell size were quantified. MUN offspring had lower BMI and liver glycogen compared with CON. Pathway analysis showed differences for skeletal muscle and liver, including hepatic splicing and unfolded protein response. MUN offspring consumed more sugar drink than CON. After HFCS, MUN BMIs were similar to CON. Liver showed coordinated response to HFCS in CON but not MUN. Pathway and liver glycogen differences between MUN and CON at baseline indicate in utero programming persists in MUN juveniles. MUN catchup growth during HFCS suggests increased risk of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Greater sugar drink consumption in MUN demonstrates altered appetitive drive due to programming. Differences in blood leptin concentrations, omental adipocyte cell size, liver glycogen content, and tissue-specific molecular response to HFCS challenge suggest MUN significantly impacts juvenile offspring ability to manage an energy rich diet. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=172 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/548121v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (45K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b15085org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11d4c1dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@704209org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ff9791_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- G-Protein Coupled Receptor 19 (Gpr19) Knockout Mice Display Sex-Dependent Metabolic Dysfunction 95%
- Gene and metabolite expression dependence on body mass index in human myocardium 94%
- Reduced central and peripheral inflammatory responses and increased mitochondrial activity contribute to diet-induced obesity resistance in WSB/EiJ mice. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lipid metabolism links nutrient-exercise timing to insulin sensitivity in men classified as overweight or obese. 95%
- Early changes in immune cell metabolism and function are a hallmark of sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective human study 94%
- Impaired Suppression of Plasma Lipid Extraction and its Partitioning Away from Muscle by Insulin in Humans with Obesity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- 17α-estradiol Alleviates High-Fat Diet-Induced Inflammatory and Metabolic Dysfunction in Skeletal Muscle of Male and Female Mice 97%
- Exercise-Induced Benefits On Glucose Handling In A Model Of Diet-Induced Obesity Are Reduced By Concurrent Nicotinamide Mononucleotide 96%
- Differences in metabolic and liver pathobiology induced by two dietary mouse models of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dietary isoleucine content defines the metabolic and molecular response to a Western diet 95%
- Targeted and selective knockout of the TLQP-21 neuropeptide unmasks its unique role in energy homeostasis 95%
- Mechanisms underlying the efficacy of a rodent model of vertical sleeve gastrectomy - a focus on energy expenditure 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.